Back to @joinautopilot's profile

Autopilot engagement report

@joinautopilot - 238K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.049%
of 238K followers
Per impression
0.495%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
9.94%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
117
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 117 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.495% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Autopilot's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.049%, Autopilot sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 371 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 202621x their median

    Breaking: President Trump promises a $5,000 payment to every adult in the U.S. if Republicans win House and Senate https://t.co/xWmLdZrJCi

    1.6K101469253754K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202613x their median

    Breaking: Rep. William Timmons (R) disclosed his first stock purchase in 6 years He bought up to $100K of $SPCX shares on June 15th Timmons is now the 5th Congress member to buy into SpaceX https://t.co/ASiEMwZfck

    1.3K9112915316K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20266.3x their median

    Breaking: Nike getting removed from the S&P after 18 years $NKE crashed 76% in the last 5 years https://t.co/lkMfsIMjgl

    63443481682K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20265.9x their median

    Breaking: Leopold Aschenbrenner's former positions are all spiking today • Solaris Energy $SEI: +16.6% • CoreWeave $CRWV: +15.9% • Nebius $NBIS: +11.8% • Bloom Energy $BE: +10.9% • Keel Infrastructure $KEEL: +10.5% • Applied Digital $APLD: +9.9% • IREN $IREN: +8.5% What could have been if he didn't use leverage

    61852195107K viewsView on X
  • Jan 28, 20264.6x their median

    Excited to share we’ve partnered with @public to bring Autopilot’s strategies to all Public investors. Anyone with a Public account can now invest in any Autopilot strategy in just a few clicks To celebrate, go open a Public account and get 3 months of Autopilot Premium on us https://t.co/5PRwu3U6H8

    44638508635K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20264.4x their median

    Update: The Trump administration committed $2,000,000,000 to quantum computing companies in exchange for equity stakes Majority of them are public and are surging today • Rigetti $RGTI +8.7% • D-Wave Quantum $QBTS +8.1% • Infleqtion $INFQ +7.9% • GlobalFoundries $GFS +0.7% • IBM $IBM -1.5%

    4525211344K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.6x their median

    Breaking: Keel Infrastructure is spiking as its Sherbrooke data center project advances through formal city council review Leopold Aschenbrenner disclosed a ~$151,830,996 position in Q2 2026 $KEEL has added ~$133,000,000 in market cap today https://t.co/f18KszlnfB

    27621103105K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.6x their median

    NASDAQ 100 stocks with the highest returns in 2026: 1. SanDisk $SNDK: +548.33% 2. Micron Technology $MU: +230.69% 3. Seagate Technology blockstack:native: +188.84% 4. Western Digital $WDC: +157.24% 5. Marvell Technology $MRVL: +149.11% 6. Nebius Group $NBIS: +148.13% 7. Intel $INTC: +144.23% 8. Lumentum Holdings $LITE: +130.13% 9. Arm Holdings $ARM: +118.40% 10. Advanced Micro Devices $AMD: +113.82%

    272238331K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.6x their median

    Breaking: ServiceNow is spiking after signing a Collaboration Agreement with Aramco Digital to power AI workflows across Aramco's affiliate network in 50+ countries $NOW has added ~$7,630,000,000 in market cap today https://t.co/zPLcwpHeQe

    2741911128K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.3x their median

    I just bought the FEAR on $CRDO after an 18% crash. It's one of just 4 stocks in my hyper-concentrated Asymmetrical Bets portfolio on @joinautopilot, focused on the couple stocks I think have the most upside in the AI buildout. Nothing changed in that belief after their earnings. I understand that gross margin slipped a bit, but if that's from the optical business taking share isn't that a core part of the bull thesis? And declining sequential growth = the copper business settling into a steadier cadence while optical gets ready to ramp. The 2027 ramp will be insane - $SPCX is supposedly Credo's biggest customer at 34% of revenue. SemiAnalysis estimates SpaceX could spend $300B to $500B on data centers in 2027 alone as they expand from 1.4 GW toward 6 to 10 GW of AI compute. At the end of the day, this was a strong beat and raise quarter. Revenue grew 114.7% YoY, FY27 guidance was raised from 80% to 85% growth, and new NPO design wins show the DustPhotonics integration is ahead of schedule. Reducing cash equivalent $SGOV by ~3% to buy into $CRDO, increasing from 14.34% allocation to ~17%. For rationale on the investment, read the Substack article: https://t.co/CAkbXU3FsN To follow along these trades in your brokerage: https://t.co/modqlAY3Jn

    2231826362K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 117 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.049%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.495% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

What is Autopilot's engagement rate on X?
Autopilot (@joinautopilot) has an engagement rate of 0.049%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 237,613 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.049%, Autopilot sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @joinautopilot have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @joinautopilot post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going