Back to @johnpavlovitz's profile

John Pavlovitz Official engagement report

@johnpavlovitz - 381K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.286%
of 381K followers
Per impression
9.25%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
3.09%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.085%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 381K followers, an engagement rate of 0.286%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 9.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

John Pavlovitz Official's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.286%, John Pavlovitz Official sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202638x their median

    He would have been an incredible president. https://t.co/z4rCCcURNi

    35K2.2K3.9K216384K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 202334x their median

    Kindness is woke. Compassion is woke. Generosity is woke, Love is woke. To those who traffic in this latest culture war cry, to be woke is to be deeply human. And that humanity will be the foe they cannot defeat and are right to fear. Woke will win. https://t.co/e4PRMkTNcj

    18K5.2K13K1.1K3.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202631x their median

    Oil will go under $50. Gas prices will crater to $2/gallon. Inflation will plummet. Stocks will go parabolic. Job market will shock everyone. AI bubble never pops. All before midterms. The golden age is here folks. Get your seatbelt in and enjoy the ride. Red wave incoming. https://t.co/UOA7P96gRH

    23K3.1K6.4K4913.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.4x their median

    Dolly Parton was not MAGA in any way; she was its beautiful counterpoint. She was a vaccine-supporting, nature-preserving, book-loving, trans-defending gay icon, and nearly everything she stood for flies fully in the face of the cruel, sneering, exclusionary narcissism of your vile, bloviating, spray-tanned messiah and his hateful movement, which you so joyfully partner in. Yes, you should aspire to emulate her and endeavor to replicate the generosity and unconditional love she so easily moved through this life with. And you’re welcome to show her respect and gratitude; in fact, you should. But please, don’t try to claim her as yours today, MAGA. She simply wasn’t. https://t.co/JqcMvJ7vWP

    4.7K1.2K01924K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20265.2x their median

    Spider-Man to the rescue. Why is Jake Lang allowed to harass the public time and time again? https://t.co/3ZFqB3vzfB

    4.7K65021696148K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.0x their median

    He's losing to Iran. He's losing to Canada. He's losing to gravity. He's losing his mind. He's losing control of Congress. He's a loser's loser.

    3.9K43701119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.3x their median

    I will rejoice the day he leaves the planet, and I won't apologize for it.

    3.3K23802524K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.4x their median

    Beyond sick https://t.co/Tu0TmgOR4c

    1.5K250666165948K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.2x their median

    If you're trying to locate @googlemaps today, you'll find them up Trump's rear end.

    2.2K2390715K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.1x their median

    The Supreme Court is an treasonous abomination.

    2.0K29502735K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 381K followers, an engagement rate of 0.286%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,792 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 9.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 38x its own typical post.

What is John Pavlovitz Official's engagement rate on X?
John Pavlovitz Official (@johnpavlovitz) has an engagement rate of 0.286%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 381,072 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.286%, John Pavlovitz Official sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @johnpavlovitz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,792 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @johnpavlovitz post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going