Back to @johnelincoln's profile

John Lincoln engagement report

@johnelincoln - 153K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 153K followers
Per impression
0.469%
852 views on a typical post
Reach
0.56%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.23/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 153K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 24,308 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 852 times each, and 0.469% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.556% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.8K interactions, about 2459x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ecommerce, #googleads, #marketing.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #ecommerce, #googleads, #marketing.

Compared with accounts its own size

John Lincoln's engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (24,308 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, John Lincoln sits below the 10th percentile of the 244,015 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.027%.

p100.004%
p250.027%
p50 (median)0.158%
p750.745%
p902.77%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 244,015 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 20,103 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.027%
50th percentile0.158%
75th percentile0.745%
90th percentile2.77%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video42% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 205 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 20, 20262459x their median

    AI is a mirror. lazy people get lazy results. curious people get superpowers.

    8.7K91715095142K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026192x their median

    The longer you’re a founder, the more you realize speed covers up a lot of mistakes.

    6664154521K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20263.8x their median

    Tell me about your business. I'd love to see if we can partner! #business

    63512.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20263.0x their median

    When you say you want to do something and people say you can’t do it, but you know you can, and then you do it. That’s the best. I love it.

    91202.2K viewsView on X
  • May 14, 20266.0x their median

    New Report Released! How to Measure ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude Traffic in GA4 https://t.co/vNwIQXHiFj https://t.co/Zx7I4UOuD0

    7140727 viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20264.5x their median

    With 41% of LinkedIn users now generating their posts with AI, unique, authentic human content becomes more valuable every week.

    60212.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.0x their median

    I love people who get others a little extra pumped up. They just add extra encouragement, and over time, next thing you know, everybody’s more successful, including them, because they get themselves fired up in the process.

    71001.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.0x their median

    Should AI robots have to go the office or can they work from home?

    50302.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20261.8x their median

    Your reputation compounds. Return the call. Show up prepared. Do what you said. Own mistakes. Help people when there's nothing immediately in it for you. Do that for 20 years and interesting things happen.

    61001.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.8x their median

    A lot of success is just doing what you said you were going to do, over and over again.

    70001.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ecommerce#googleads#marketing#seo#surfing

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 153K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 24,308 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 852 times each, and 0.469% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.556% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.8K interactions, about 2459x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ecommerce, #googleads, #marketing.

What is John Lincoln's engagement rate on X?
John Lincoln (@johnelincoln) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 153,112 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, John Lincoln sits below the 10th percentile of the 244,015 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @johnelincoln have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (24,308 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @johnelincoln post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going