Back to @johncusack's profile

John Cusack engagement report

@johncusack - 1.7M followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.045%
of 1.7M followers
Per impression
2.50%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
1.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
791
interactions (median)
Saved
0.135%
42 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.73/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 791 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 2.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 111x its own typical post.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

John Cusack's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, John Cusack sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 2026111x their median

    What a wonderful and touching gesture. Arianna Hamilton lost her job at Burger King after taking a stand and saying, “Free Palestine.” The people of Palestine painted a mural in her honor, celebrated her, and thanked her for standing with them. https://t.co/DirrjWF2FP

    71K16K606257843K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026108x their median

    Israel has said that paper kites flown by Palestinian children will be treated as weapons of war. Read that again. This is the reality of genocide: the total destruction of innocence, freedom and joy. End all military cooperation with Israel, now.

    62K20K2.9K5072.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202687x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Famous British comedian Mr. Bean: "I feel ashamed on behalf of the United Kingdom for allowing Israel to besiege two million people in Gaza, cutting off electricity, water, and medicine from them, and then claiming to defend human rights." https://t.co/Ds5SOylaPh

    58K10K4051372.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202649x their median

    If you find yourself asking why isn’t the world doing something to stop the genocide in Gaza and you have not spoken up, they are taking your silence as approval. Whether you’ve 2 or 2 million followers speak up FFS! Silence is complicity.

    29K9.6K510154349K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202634x their median

    The MOST IMMORAL ARMY strikes again.And again. And again. In the West Bank, soldiers and settlers cut water pipes, while Qusra's siege continues. In Gaza the pulverization continues and so the massacres.Since the ceasefire Israel has killed 1,200+ people, including 300 children.

    19K8.0K26891189K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202624x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Pope Leo: “We cannot believe in Jesus and promote war. We cannot believe in Jesus and kill the innocent. We cannot believe in Jesus and abandon those who suffer, those who weep, those who flee from misery.” https://t.co/D7GZDOEkdx

    15K4.0K251140152K viewsView on X
  • Dec 20, 202518x their median

    Israel has claimed responsibility for bombing a wedding celebration in Gaza City yesterday that killed 7 people from two families, including a 4-month-old baby. Israel offered no explanation for violating the ceasefire, but acknowledged that “uninvolved civilians” were killed.

    12K6.5K2094602.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202612x their median

    How can anyone defend this?

    8.8K3.1K61495332K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202614x their median

    This is fantastic https://t.co/NuzmXl09HF

    8.5K2.5K23674128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20269.8x their median

    This video is real and not a movie clip. NEVER STOP TALKING ABOUT PALESTINE! https://t.co/ByIAocFL71

    4.9K2.6K1153542K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 791 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 2.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 111x its own typical post.

What is John Cusack's engagement rate on X?
John Cusack (@johncusack) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,741,787 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, John Cusack sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @johncusack have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @johncusack post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going