lobistars🇳🇬 engagement report
@john322226 - 298K followers on X
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.778%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 7.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 72K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026. Recurring tag: #lowkey.
Compared with accounts its own size
lobistars🇳🇬's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.778%, lobistars🇳🇬 sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 38% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 118 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jan 21, 202631x their median
.
- Sep 5, 202617x their median
British-Nigerian influencer Tiny d!es after undergoing p*nis enlargement procedure in Thailand. https://t.co/5UwfMTZ1Rq
- Sep 16, 20265.1x their median
Barcelona fans are acting like Real Madrid didn’t score 5 goals against that small racing Santander club. https://t.co/6Zh82frp8T
- Sep 17, 20265.1x their median
This 3-0 Chelsea knack Barcelona na generational banter material bcos of how they bragged online before the match. Once you show them this screenshot them go start to crash out 😂😂😂 https://t.co/otkhrBxsNP
- Sep 4, 20264.7x their median
Since Tiwa savage threaten to arrest Damiforeign, he never tweet anything about her again 😂😂 https://t.co/XKlcQ2LOyB
- Oct 17, 20264.5x their median
Haaland is at a level where they don’t even compete with him for the Golden Boot award. Pep Guardiola lied when he said nobody can replace Agüero 😂😂
- Oct 18, 20264.2x their median
Kai Cenat got tired of driving Lamborghini and Ferrari, then decided to buy the tiniest car in the world🤣 https://t.co/RvkRNszq8o
- Oct 18, 20264.2x their median
If you collect better money, no chest like three straight Billings from your babe and if she break up, tear your new ride. She go start to think say she be badluck 🤣
- Sep 16, 20263.1x their median
"The Chinese aren't your friends" yeah, no shit Sherlocks. Is it you that is my friend? What you're selling to me for 800K with a cost price of 150K, is that friendship? What if we're now enemies? 😭 When you're not Jude Okoye. https://t.co/rlhbtgAjDv
- Sep 18, 20262.5x their median
Match is still on and they are already granting interview to Brentford player. They don’t even rate Chelsea to do a comeback😭😂😂 https://t.co/s6vNQRqzM2
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.778%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 7.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 72K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.
- What is lobistars🇳🇬's engagement rate on X?
- lobistars🇳🇬 (@john322226) has an engagement rate of 0.778%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 298,231 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.778%, lobistars🇳🇬 sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @john322226 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @john322226 post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.