Joel Comm engagement report
@joelcomm - 590K followers on X
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 590K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.157% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.649% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 4391x its own typical post.
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Joel Comm's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Joel Comm sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 84% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 26% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 26% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 216 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 18, 20264391x their median
This memo says that any non-citizen that votes in America’s elections is to be DEPORTED. Finally! I voted for this. https://t.co/ZVEQJMsZIs
- Sep 9, 20262328x their median
Women have aborted 4-20x more children over the past 50 years than the sum total of people killed in all wars in human history. The number of children aborted today equals all wars in all of human history every 2-6 years. https://t.co/KQAezIi9rU
- Sep 20, 20262120x their median
Say it a little louder for the feminist retards in the back. 👏🏼 https://t.co/C9LeWkGpsV
- Aug 3, 20261643x their median
These folks have no idea how to run a business, have never run a business, and — wait for it — they put out an RFP to let entrepreneurs run their state sponsored grocery stores So… the government is going to pay companies to discount groceries, which have a 1-2% profit margin Amazing!!! 🍿 Can’t wait to see them use some insane DEI criteria to select the RFP winners and this entire experiment to devolve into chaos! COSTCO ALREADY HAS ZERO PROFIT MARGIN GROCERIES — YOU MIGHT AS WELL JUST NEGOTIATE BUYING ACCESS TO THEIR SELECTION FOR DISADVANTAGED NEW YORKERS!!! https://t.co/vSnzctp57Y
- Aug 22, 2026234x their median
Artist Jessica Cook was spotted in Brooklyn presenting her latest artwork. The event sold out. It called “Buckets ‘O Money” https://t.co/Hij8LgivrF
- Sep 1, 2026233x their median
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!? Tyler Robinson’s defense attorney attacked Charlie Kirk IN COURT… this man is a LUNATIC!!! “Mr. Kirk spoke HATEFULLY of certain groups of people.” https://t.co/8fZCMl0QRv
- Sep 3, 2026197x their median
621K is the total viewers on CNN’s most popular show. How freaking EMBARASSING for them. https://t.co/VDYyLTKH3A
- Sep 15, 202699x their median
‘Looksmaxxing’ streamer Clavicular, who teaches men how to be ‘masculine’ and ‘alpha male,’ shows off his makeup routine. https://t.co/WN02bDEPk3
- Sep 3, 202670x their median
. @shoe0nhead’s video on the Lindsay Clancy cases dropped six hours ago and it already has over half a million views. This case is cultural moment. https://t.co/dwamLQGZi3
- Aug 15, 202636x their median
I watched the entire @RealCandaceO @paleochristcon debate. I’m stunned at the number of people who don’t understand how a debate is judged. The central dispute was whether the evidence supports the allegation that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk or whether Robinson was framed as a “patsy.” Candace gave literally NO evidence to substantiate her claims. None. Zero. Based on this alone, Andrew won. But people are swayed by gotcha moments. They think that because Andrew wasn’t able to list the seven counts that he somehow lost. That’s a completely irrelevant point. He’s not even the most likable person, which he admitted. But a debate isn’t a popularity contest. At least not for those paying attention to the actual arguments. We have not people how to think critically. Too many of y’all are swayed by emotion and don’t use your heads. I didn’t have a dog in the hunt and just wanted to hear the evidence. It was disappointing. Candace may end up being correct, but based on the claims which formed the basis for the debate, Andrew won. And that’s not even up for debate.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 590K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 0.157% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.649% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 4391x its own typical post.
- What is Joel Comm's engagement rate on X?
- Joel Comm (@joelcomm) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 590,262 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Joel Comm sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @joelcomm have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @joelcomm post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.