Back to @joaoscar_'s profile

joao scar engagement report

@joaoscar_ - 151K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.095%
of 151K followers
Per impression
1.64%
8.8K views on a typical post
Reach
5.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
145
interactions (median)
Saved
0.193%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 145 interactions against 151K followers, an engagement rate of 0.095%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 1.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 166x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

joao scar's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.095%, joao scar sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,130 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 462 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 19, 2026166x their median

    Assunto sério 🚨 https://t.co/H7p2vXU7Bm

    22K1.4K129692.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202654x their median

    caiado: esse tema é de suma relevância e eu sempre disse que… augusto cury: existe um estudo que eu como professor gosto muito que é… renan santos: lula petista maldito escroto lixo viado corrupto… fim do debate

    7.4K4333911111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202632x their median

    Motivo do ban: Lei felca. Eu nem moro no Brasil caramba. https://t.co/BUWj8YU2ou

    4.0K14137680785K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202629x their median

    Melhor dica do dia: baixem o Brave pra celular, apenas.

    4.1K725111659K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202616x their median

    9 e vcs? https://t.co/Z4YxScyruv

    1.4K37700179152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.8x their median

    Não sou a favor de tirar a candidatura, não pelos motivos alegados… Mas pelo que eu conheço, pra quem pediu a prisão do Olavo do Carvalho, xingou, desmoralizou e desrespeitou o Enéas e fica zoando o Pablo Marçal por estar inelegível, isso se chama KARMA! https://t.co/bcNeKclhHH

    5873074657K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.6x their median

    Descansar 60 segundos entre as series é das sabotagens, talvez a mais entregue como via de regra por personais quando ficam com preguiça de trabalhar. Você não recupera ATP suficiente, entra na outra série ofegante e isso transforma seu treino em um cardio exaustivo com pesos.

    6311121177K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20263.8x their median

    Essa notificação que rola as vezes quando alguém vai fazer um Pix é sem duvida um mecanismo de sabotagem isso sem duvidas foi criado sob medida pensando exclusivamente em como foder com o empresário, não tem outra explicação… Ja apareceu isso pra mim transferindo para o airbnb, agora dessa vez pra Stone num serviço que eu pago faz 2 anos todo mes e acho o serviço maravilhoso; Num pais serio isso viraria causa ganha num processo civil milionário contra o responsável por criar isso, eu conheço vários casos, sendo um deles de um brother que vende carro e manda de cegonha pra outros estados, ele me disse que já perdeu mais de 5 boas vendas que seriam de mais de 5 dígitos que já estavam fechadas por conta disso ai. Essa tela satânica sempre apita sem absolutamente nenhum embasamento, só serve pra assombrar sem motivo o cliente e ferrar a venda, não serve pra nada alem disso esse lixo… Qualquer politico moralizado que trabalhar tomando a frente com algo útil contra quem fundamentou isso, vai ter alem do meu voto, propaganda gratuita aqui… isso é nojento demais porra.

    4651960995K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.3x their median

    Fumar pode fazer mal, mas os caras exageraram ao ponto de colocar foto de gente morta exposto na embalagem Seria bem melhor pro mundo se esse esforço direcionado ao tabaco fosse direcionado ao álcool Não conheço ninguém que atropelou crianças por estar alucinado de Marlboro.

    4382517522K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.1x their median

    O cara conseguiu comprar uma suprema corte, policiais federais, ministros, deputados, senadores, juízes, delegados, banqueiros e até presidentes… Mas foi moggado ao tentar comprar a arte suave, ouviu que no tatame só fazendo o exame de faixa mesmo :/ O Jiu-Jitsu salva vidas! https://t.co/s81nbBEl0B

    4072612118K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 145 interactions against 151K followers, an engagement rate of 0.095%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 1.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 166x its own typical post.

What is joao scar's engagement rate on X?
joao scar (@joaoscar_) has an engagement rate of 0.095%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 151,071 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.095%, joao scar sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @joaoscar_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @joaoscar_ post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going