Back to @joaopedro's profile

João Pedro C. Motta engagement report

@joaopedro - 89K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.564%
of 89K followers
Per impression
1.14%
44K views on a typical post
Reach
49.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
499
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.23/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 499 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.564%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 49.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 23x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #agathaallalong, #marvel.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #agathaallalong, #marvel.

Compared with accounts its own size

João Pedro C. Motta's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.564%, João Pedro C. Motta sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 222 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202623x their median

    Três sinais claros de que o Brasil está à beira de uma crise econômica https://t.co/GkONCnybT4

    8.1K1.5K1.4K241271K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202619x their median

    A KLM flight from Amsterdam to Curaçao was forced to turn around over the Atlantic on Thursday after a power bank fire. The power bank was being used by KLM´s former CEO and President, Mr. Camiel Eurlings, who was injured in the incident. "According to a passenger who was sitting close to Eurlings and saw everything happen, the power bank was charging at the moment things went wrong . Power banks are allowed on board KLM flights, but it is not permitted to use or charge them on board." Incident occurred on a flight from Amsterdam to Curacao. (Flight KL735 operated by a B-777 - Registation "PH-BVP"] ℹ️ 📸RTL/ASN

    7.6K1.0K3433212.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202611x their median

    🚨🇧🇷 Brazilian citizen dataset allegedly leaked on a cybercrime forum, 213M+ records claimed ⠀ SERPRO (Serviço Federal de Processamento de Dados), Brazil’s federal data processing service, is named in a cybercrime forum post where a threat actor claims to have obtained a dataset containing 213,968,521 Brazilian citizen records. ⠀ The advertised data includes: ⠀ • CPF identifiers • Full names • Gender information • Dates of birth • Additional citizen-related records ⠀ The actor published what they describe as a 5 million-record proof of concept from the alleged dataset. ⠀ The complete dataset is claimed to be approximately 13.6 GB and provided in .DB format. ⠀ The claims and the authenticity, source and scope of the allegedly exposed data have not been independently verified. ⠀ 💥 No delays. No guessing. No redactions. Get the intel threat actors see, the moment they post it. https://t.co/281Qjc6p2J

    4.2K4902636381.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202611x their median

    Samsung really cooked with this Delhi Airport ad. 💀 As an Android user, I’m standing firmly behind Samsung. Hahaha 😂 https://t.co/2snDLNA6u3

    4.8K41812938454K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202610x their median

    Você compra um carro em 2018 por 50 mil reais. Você vende esse mesmo carro em 2026 por 60 mil reais. Isso só aconteceu porque a moeda perdeu valor. Porém, para a receita federal, você teve lucro na operação!! Isso é um absurdo, já passou da hora de ter uma lei que autorize deflacionar bens vendidos pelo IPCA. Isso é um escárnio com a população.

    4.8K3569615102K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20268.4x their median

    https://t.co/OVuIhnRm6v → https://t.co/kyKWp8myFL https://t.co/DHPzoRv6Oh

    3.5K1043552231.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20268.3x their median

    descobri o claude hoje e estou absolutamente fascinada

    4.0K397992598K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20268.3x their median

    O que aconteceu em Pernambuco é um caso a ser estudado. Há 2 anos João Campos era tido como presidenciável. Hoje a tendência é perder para a Raquel Lyra em 1º turno. Tem que tomar muito cuidado com esses fenômenos de internet.

    4.0K1035821108K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20266.6x their median

    🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Video A/B testing is coming to YouTube You can upload up to 3 cuts of the same video with different hooks or intros, and YouTube will pick the winner based on watch time! Titles, thumbnails, and now the video itself https://t.co/TSprQji67v

    2.6K1541324751.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.6x their median

    > be me > cold DM 200 people > personalize each one > takes 9 hours > 3 replies > 2 are “not interested” > 1 is a guy pitching me his own SaaS > his DM is better than mine > sign up for his thing > he does not sign up for mine > now paying $19/mo to a guy who found me through my own outreach

    3.1K5511525112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#agathaallalong#marvel

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 499 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.564%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 49.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 23x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #agathaallalong, #marvel.

What is João Pedro C. Motta's engagement rate on X?
João Pedro C. Motta (@joaopedro) has an engagement rate of 0.564%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 88,502 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.564%, João Pedro C. Motta sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @joaopedro have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @joaopedro post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going