Jeffrey Wooldridge engagement report
@jmwooldridge - 93K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.857% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 352x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #caturday, #gogreen.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #caturday, #gogreen.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jeffrey Wooldridge's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.044%, Jeffrey Wooldridge sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 31% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 31% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 158 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 27, 2026352x their median
BREAKING: Trump claims that airplanes didn't exist when his father was alive. Fred Trump was born in 1905 and died in 1999. "I had a wonderful father, right, and he was a hard worker who was in the real estate business... He didn't want planes. They didn't have planes in those days, I don't think." The first flight was in 1903.
- Aug 19, 202657x their median
Trump: "When our country is strong, interest rates should go down. When our country is weak, frankly they should go up." https://t.co/FJUGNfg2sU
- Jul 18, 202656x their median
I hate to say it, but more Americans would embrace soccer if more matches were like England-France.
- Aug 6, 202243x their median
Here is an updated link to my shared Dropbox. It's mostly for DiD but also has other recent projects. I'm currently cleaning up some of the Stata do files and I'll be posting. I posted the first public version of my nonlinear DiD paper. https://t.co/q1AnkhEF97
- Aug 2, 202626x their median
Trump: The U.S.A. is locked and loaded and ready to go against the Islamic Republic of Iran, at levels of Military Terror, Strength, and Power not seen since World War II. Despite this, we have just been asked by Iran, and other Middle Eastern Countries, to hold off any attack in that the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to. This would include the Immediate, Complete, and Total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT, and an end to Iran's nuclear threat. Based on this request, I have agreed, for the future benefit of the WORLD and, likewise, the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran, to cancel the attack, subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL. The Country of Israel joins me in this commitment. Get to work, everybody, and get it DONE. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
- Feb 15, 202610x their median
Let's discuss different DiD estimators with unbalanced panels -- often due to missing data on Y, or attrition. I will use the Stata commands csdid and jwdid as part of the discussion. First, a review. Assume time-constant covariates, X and a balanced panel.
- Aug 22, 20269.5x their median
I think my work is done for today. ChatGPT's latest response in a diff-in-diffs exchange I had with it: "Yes — you are right. I had the sign backwards in my last response."
- Aug 7, 20266.2x their median
Two papers now available electronically -- with former students Soo Jeong Lee (Southern Illinois) and Ruonan Xu (Rutgers). DiD and inference in spatial settings. I'm very proud of these terrific young scholars! https://t.co/9uOZGAHHbZ https://t.co/R4I8g8W33v
- Aug 7, 20266.0x their median
Me at the 5SOS concert. My daughter is probably hiding from me. The Papa Roach shirt is garnering some respect from the handful of men over 40. https://t.co/zx3Pg75CYA
- Aug 7, 20265.8x their median
In reading about the many people who’ve increased their academic output by using AI, I’m wondering about the future of low-hanging-fruit econometrics.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.857% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 352x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #caturday, #gogreen.
- What is Jeffrey Wooldridge's engagement rate on X?
- Jeffrey Wooldridge (@jmwooldridge) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 93,218 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.044%, Jeffrey Wooldridge sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @jmwooldridge have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @jmwooldridge post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.