Back to @jjjinvesting's profile

Jeffrey Weber engagement report

@jjjinvesting - 154K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 154K followers
Per impression
0.435%
460 views on a typical post
Reach
0.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 154K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 460 times each, and 0.435% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.298% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 721 interactions, about 361x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jeffrey Weber's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Jeffrey Weber sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 449 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 8, 2018361x their median

    Combine the #AIM #investing method with #LEAPS for long term profits. I’ve made the move to YouTube, watch my VIDEO here: https://t.co/Om7q70HH6L

    56474767View on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.5x their median

    I'm selling my AIM investing services business to the highest bidder over $100,000. From my sunroom I have taught investors AIM investing and they have made over $18,000,000 in profits! I'm looking to connect with a small investing practice that might open to collaboration and, down the road, a potential acquisition and business that wants additional revenue. I've built several unique contrarian investing methods that I developed myself, and it's generated over $18,000,000 in gains for clients. Would love to explore whether there is a fit. Would love to find a fit in San Antonio, TX! I'd help teach you my method for at least a year on a daily basis - I'm 79 and have no one to continue my unique way of investing and I don't it to die! Email [email protected] to start the process!!!

    90201.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.5x their median

    Here’s all Donald Trump needs to do to reduce inflation: issue an executive order that all $20 bills now are worth $25 in purchasing power and all $50 bills are worth $60 in purchasing power. He can do that he’s done more incredible things so why can’t you do that?

    50201.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.5x their median

    2029 LEAPS just issued - perfect time to start AIM investing with my help for free - only pay 5% of your profits. Email [email protected] to get a free list of new 2029 LEAPS and currently priced leveraged ETFs to get started with! And remember you get free AIM help for life. no fees for guidance. no limits. no expiration. If you want to start strong, this is the moment!

    3020260 viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.0x their median

    With the new 2029 long-term options (LEAPS) now available, investors have a fresh long-term window to begin AIM investing. Email [email protected] to learn more about how I help investors learn AIM investing for free for a lifetime https://t.co/4Asx5AEP6G

    3010263 viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.0x their median

    2029 LEAPS just issued - perfect time to start AIM investing with my help for free - only pay 5% of your profits. Email [email protected] to get a free list of new 2029 LEAPS and currently priced leveraged ETFs to get started with! And remember you get free AIM help for a lifetime! No fees for guidance, subscription renewal etc. No limits. No expiration.

    2020270 viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.0x their median

    2029 LEAPS just issued - perfect time to start AIM investing with my help for free - only pay 5% of your profits. Email [email protected] to get a free list of new 2029 LEAPS and currently priced leveraged ETFs to get started with! https://t.co/MRz47r8kms

    2020284 viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.0x their median

    America has had so many wars since it’s founding. I’m wondering if there’s ever been a year that America was a country when we had no Living war veterans because we had had peace for such a long time.

    21101.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.0x their median

    The AIM Investing Method is designed for people who want a disciplined, data-driven, and relationship-based approach to investing. I offer AIM help for free - you pay 5% of your profits! I build long-tern partnerships with clients who value trust, clarity, and performance. I've built my reputation on transparency, credibility, and consistent results - not promises. My clients include individuals I've helped generate million-dollar gains and they are willing to vouch for AIM investing. my integrity, and the $1,000,000+ profits. Email [email protected] to get started

    3010519 viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.0x their median

    Has Mitch McConnell used up his sick leave yet? I know the federal government’s generous with sick leave but I didn’t think you could get indefinite sick leave unless you lived in Germany and were German!

    20201.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 154K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 460 times each, and 0.435% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.298% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 721 interactions, about 361x its own typical post.

What is Jeffrey Weber's engagement rate on X?
Jeffrey Weber (@jjjinvesting) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 154,195 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Jeffrey Weber sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jjjinvesting have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jjjinvesting post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going