Back to @jimrome's profile

Jim Rome engagement report

@jimrome - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 112 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.005%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.172%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
2.98%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
57
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.83/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 57 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 112 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.172% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 112 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.7K interactions, about 83x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #whatsyourbeef, #49ers, #browns.

Measured over 112 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #whatsyourbeef, #49ers, #browns.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jim Rome's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, Jim Rome sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 202683x their median

    #49ers owner Jed York was arrested Sunday in East Palestine, Ohio, and pleaded no contest to misdemeanor charges of disorderly conduct and possessing criminal tools, per @WKBN. York was sentenced to 2 days in jail and ordered to pay $1,150 in fines. https://t.co/XufQ5NgwIJ https://t.co/mrxRWGTe3X

    3.6K3933054374.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202661x their median

    Deshaun Watson wins the starting job. Most #Browns thing ever. He should be off the team. Hell, he should have never been on the team

    3.1K2501531659K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202635x their median

    Bad quarterback. Bad guy. Bad organization. Deshaun Watson is irreparably damaged. https://t.co/TL8mH0r7DZ

    1.7K183832565K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202617x their median

    Jed York, the hell are you and your franchise doing?! https://t.co/OCWYyAPc8v

    77897921575K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202613x their median

    "As long as you're Raiders, they'll never let you win.'" Raiders legend @LKennedy72 on what Jon Gruden told the team after the Tuck Rule game and what led to Gruden's trade to the Bucs. https://t.co/2LemCXMLzf

    6197320757K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202612x their median

    Lifelong So Cal here. There’s a good reason you’ve never heard me say LA is a great sports town... https://t.co/cvDSWJfCbG

    57040481867K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20269.8x their median

    "Denver is the team to beat in the AFC." @wyche89 explains why he's a believer in Bo Nix and the Broncos this season. https://t.co/FzK4TcNPOc

    4955111443K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20269.6x their median

    Doesn't seem like Browns fan has accepted Deshaun Watson's "apology." https://t.co/fBcIMGpAUh

    4553551439K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.5x their median

    "A lot of people get caught up in some of the numbers in the pass game, but that identity for us offensively has always been the run game." @coachjoshheupel on the @Vol_Football offense this season. https://t.co/Ov5MBUgviW

    378415140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.0x their median

    "When I got here, my very first stop right when I landed -- before I even met the team -- was going by to see Cal at practice." @RazorbackFB HC @RSilverfield on his relationship with @CoachCalArk. https://t.co/WsyUeJAwf6

    362340359K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#whatsyourbeef#49ers#browns#talkinball#ufcsacramento

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 57 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 112 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 0.172% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.98% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 112 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.7K interactions, about 83x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #whatsyourbeef, #49ers, #browns.

What is Jim Rome's engagement rate on X?
Jim Rome (@jimrome) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 112 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,108,634 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, Jim Rome sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jimrome have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jimrome post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going