Back to @jim_kun_'s profile

ジン-JIM- engagement report

@jim_kun_ - 412K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.426%
of 412K followers
Per impression
0.645%
272K views on a typical post
Reach
66.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.208%
566 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 412K followers, an engagement rate of 0.426%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 272K times each, and 0.645% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 65.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 58% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ジン-JIM-'s engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.426%, ジン-JIM- sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 66 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 8, 202611x their median

    「元彼は某恋リア俳優」165cmGカップの合法L●Kちゃんが超逸材でやばすぎました。 ↓本編↓ https://t.co/9hJYWvERiY

    18K1.3K421.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20269.1x their median

    「ユニフォーム際どくてエロっ」で有名な某チア部合法L●Kちゃん脱がせたらめちゃ綺麗に処理してた笑 おっとり系なのに潮吹きまくってえぐい、、 ↓本編↓ https://t.co/6HuZHT2a9S

    15K83814979K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20267.4x their median

    エロに興味なさそうなマッ●店員合法L●Kちゃんがまさかのアナル舐めしてくれました。 ↓本編↓ https://t.co/mrKyXQEQ9a

    12K706631.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20265.3x their median

    「バレたら即削除」デビュー前の現役アイドル研究生合法L●Kちゃんと密会してきました。 ↓本編↓ https://t.co/16b6VGnmkM

    8.8K53950795K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.2x their median

    50本限定の逆NTR動画、完売したんですけど大好評なのでもう50本追加します、、! https://t.co/qUEwBzw7IL

    5.3K27610461K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.3x their median

    冬のバスケ全国大会出場と志望校合格を目指してる合法L●Kちゃんと猛特訓してきました。 https://t.co/TVVFfD9iNb

    3.8K24931114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.2x their median

    ⚠️24時間後に完全終了します⚠️ 人気で3日間延長することにしたセール、あと24時間で完全終了しちゃいます。まだの方はお早めに! 18,920円→6,980円 です。 ↓本編↓ https://t.co/UCmadbkzTY

    3.5K26512643K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20262.1x their median

    セールが人気なので3日間延長することにしました。 18,920円→6,980円でめちゃくちゃお得です ↓本編↓ https://t.co/QDkDyuVFfu

    3.5K23030842K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026

    165cmGカップの超逸材合法L●Kちゃんが僕にだけ全裸オナニー見せてくれました。 ↓本編(プラン特典)↓ https://t.co/wjeDXjkz1d

    2.0K8011485K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    「ユニフォーム際どくてエロっ」で有名な某チア部合法L●Kちゃんのオナニーです。 ↓本編↓ https://t.co/bfCGoDqAoz

    1.7K6930331K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 412K followers, an engagement rate of 0.426%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 272K times each, and 0.645% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 65.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 58% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is ジン-JIM-'s engagement rate on X?
ジン-JIM- (@jim_kun_) has an engagement rate of 0.426%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 412,237 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.426%, ジン-JIM- sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jim_kun_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jim_kun_ post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going