Back to @jgindel's profile

Janice Gindel engagement report

@jgindel - 122K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.086%
of 122K followers
Per impression
1.43%
7.3K views on a typical post
Reach
5.98%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
104
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.37/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 104 interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 0.086%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 1.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 235x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #blue, #bumpup, #sinner4lyfe.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #blue, #bumpup, #sinner4lyfe.

Compared with accounts its own size

Janice Gindel's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.086%, Janice Gindel sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 255 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 3, 2026235x their median

    👍🏽🌹👏🏽💔 https://t.co/VE4LnmK7H3

    19K3.5K1.5K72108K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202654x their median

    MAGA man ready to call ICE on Hispanic driver for Lyft—after he got his own location wrong. "You're a Mexican piece of shit!" he yells. "Like every one of you are!" His racist insults began inside car. Then he started shoving & kicking her seat from the back. She called 911 and started to record his actions for evidence to file a report. The man evidently put in the incorrect destination for his trip—and she just did her job to take him there. ICE activity in Idaho has surged since 2025—jumping over 800% under Trump Twice-weekly deportation flights take off out of Twin Falls—and 14 state and local agencies have now signed onto 287(g) cooperation agreements. The incident occurred near Eagle, Idaho. Lyft driver doesn't have an account on this platform—so posting first full length and credited video here to help raise awareness.

    3.1K1.9K448185127K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202626x their median

    BREAKING: Trump officials Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are helping sell off Russian oil abroad. The lead buyer gave $1 million to Trump's super PAC. https://t.co/UcTUOyJZfw

    1.6K1.0K554528K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20261.7x their median

    This is your Republican President!!! Remember this when you vote in November!!! Vote Blue all the way, please!!!!! https://t.co/qbhxqQEL4M

    98562111.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 2026

    Disfruta del sol, de la familia, de los amigos, del mar, de un café tranquilo o de cualquier pequeño instante que te haga sentir bien. La vida también se construye con esas cosas sencillas, con esas cosas que transmiten mucho amor y mucha paz en nuestro corazón.! #LindoDía 🫶🏻🌞 https://t.co/feLsHSWNmt

    10433113.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    @Scaramucci gave one of the best analysis of politics with @NicolleDWallace tonight that I have ever heard. I had goosebumps throughout. He touched on past presidents and the current one, widely. He gave suggestions to the Democratic Party on how to approach now. DON'T MISS IT.

    2623113K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    Nicolle Wallace interviewing Anthony Scaramucci on her MS Now (92NY) show; it is phenomenal!!! I am going to order his new book, All the Wrong Moves, he is so on target about Trump and his a** kissers!!!! Hope you all make it a point to see it on MS Now; I'm sure it will be repeated again. Be sure to check your tv schedules.

    10420412 viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026

    This ridiculous Nixon thing .. I bet Woodward and Bernstein are about to explode with anger !!

    11031777 viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    Football all day, just was having heart failure watching my KC Chiefs; what a great ending to a game that had me at times pulling my hair out!!!!!

    7000410 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#blue#bumpup#sinner4lyfe#activegains#connecttogrow

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 104 interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 0.086%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 1.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 235x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #blue, #bumpup, #sinner4lyfe.

What is Janice Gindel's engagement rate on X?
Janice Gindel (@jgindel) has an engagement rate of 0.086%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 122,147 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.086%, Janice Gindel sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jgindel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jgindel post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going