Back to @jesslynnn_ca's profile

ame engagement report

@jesslynnn_ca - 348K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
1.91%
of 348K followers
Per impression
6.39%
104K views on a typical post
Reach
29.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.189%
196 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 6.6K interactions against 348K followers, an engagement rate of 1.91%. Posts are seen about 104K times each, and 6.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tag: #hopecore.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.91%, ame sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.677% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 51 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 30, 202516x their median

    MAX VERSTAPPEN WINSSSS THE QATAR GRAND PRIX! 🏆 #F1 || #QatarGP 🇶🇦 https://t.co/y1Dh9BAiMh

    39K8.4K359899820K viewsView on X
  • Feb 27, 20263.8x their median

    that stupid shade of green wall paint. the ugly out of place banner. the hanging lights. the flimsy looking door and the space above the door. i know what you are. https://t.co/UgeYp6BtCZ

    22K2.2K274331.3M viewsView on X
  • Jan 11, 20262.8x their median

    tunggu.. 😭 https://t.co/EXr19Cd4Tt

    15K1.0K1.0K1.1K1.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.6x their median

    ‘SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY’ releases on 4K UHD, Blu-ray and DVD on November 17. https://t.co/Lmcsy4Eqm1

    16K1.2K99252335K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.5x their median

    Team ironman kinda seems cursed 🤧 https://t.co/3YSeJeFCT5

    16K807621302.8M viewsView on X
  • Jan 6, 20265.0x their median

    GACORRRR BENERAN BUKAAA COYYY OMGGG YAAMPUN😭💥 https://t.co/XhLpHF2AfL

    12K4815081.8K2.6M viewsView on X
  • May 31, 20261.9x their median

    Umur 24 masih boleh twintail gak kak? https://t.co/2Ee4BLVG7o

    11K1.6K45068236K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20221.8x their median

    2 big days in a week done✨ https://t.co/3m8sKwJNMY

    11K636387101View on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    emang kgk ada pose lain ya? https://t.co/cXRyYizLv6

    6.1K4136111104K viewsView on X
  • May 27, 2026

    KESEL TO THE MAXXXX GEGARA STRUKTUR BANGUNAN BERAKHIR PUNYA RUANGAN GA GUNA SEUPRIT GINII. MAU DIBIKIN APA PUN GA TAUU!! tolong warga X bantu desain aku udah pusing beut ngeliatnya mana ga bisa dibongjar lagii😭😭😭 https://t.co/HvlHgUKwRn

    4.9K1256692531.9M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#hopecore

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6.6K interactions against 348K followers, an engagement rate of 1.91%. Posts are seen about 104K times each, and 6.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48K interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is ame's engagement rate on X?
ame (@jesslynnn_ca) has an engagement rate of 1.91%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 347,557 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.91%, ame sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jesslynnn_ca have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @jesslynnn_ca post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going