Back to @jessepollak's profile

jesse.base.eth engagement report

@jessepollak - 357K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.154%
of 357K followers
Per impression
1.21%
46K views on a typical post
Reach
12.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
554
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.57/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 554 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.154%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

jesse.base.eth's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.154%, jesse.base.eth sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,862 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.672%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,862 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 12, 20263.0x their median

    very grateful for @cobie

    1.5K361651676K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.4x their median

    Borrow up to $3,000 based on your Ethos Credibility Score. No collateral, no liquidation and no KYC. @ethos_network users with a score of 1800+ are eligible. https://t.co/bNnd9AyuMt

    9849215099689K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.4x their median

    Tokenized stocks on @base are actually 1:1.

    9977220054114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20261.9x their median

    if you're tokenizing non-US equities/stocks, I want to help you do it on @base reach out or tag anyone you know doing this - global capital markets

    7866318715231K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.8x their median

    now we make base the best chain for every single financial action across coinbase and coinbase wallet work to do — but couldn't be happier to have them as our first and biggest customers!

    776621441645K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 20264.8x their median

    cbBTC. cbETH. cbXRP. cbDOGE. cbADA. cbLTC. ..and now: cbMEGA cb Wrapped Assets let you hold with @Coinbase's security and move freely across DeFi on Base cbMEGA is supported by these ecosystem platforms from day one ↓ https://t.co/IxCJjNah5P

    67412310929136K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    late night friday building on @base

    592371401449K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    have been using @bot and it's really good

    427191171591K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    You think equities onchain are interesting. Just wait for bonds. As a former bond trader, this is the one I’m really excited about. And not just US Treasuries. Gilts, bunds, emerging market sovereigns, corporate credit, the whole yield curve. Then eventually rates and credit derivatives. Bonds are also just much better collateral than equities. Government bonds make up more than half of the initial margin posted for non-cleared derivatives in TradFi. They’re liquid, they yield and they don’t move as much as equities. Crypto has already found real PMF for DeFi in borrowing, lending and collateral. Putting a much wider range of bonds onchain makes all of that more interesting. It also massively increases the amount and variety of high-quality yield available to consumers. Onchain bonds are going to be fun.

    42245632446K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    original landing page remains based af https://t.co/9Wd9zsvp9A

    4472961228K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 554 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.154%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post.

What is jesse.base.eth's engagement rate on X?
jesse.base.eth (@jessepollak) has an engagement rate of 0.154%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 356,545 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.154%, jesse.base.eth sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,862 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jessepollak have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jessepollak post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going