Back to @jcpastrana's profile

Juan Carlos Pastrana engagement report

@jcpastrana - 241K followers on X

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 241K followers
Per impression
3.55%
2.9K views on a typical post
Reach
1.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
103
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.5/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 103 interactions against 241K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 3.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 153x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #atención, #bogotá, #cnews.

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #atención, #bogotá, #cnews.

Compared with accounts its own size

Juan Carlos Pastrana's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, Juan Carlos Pastrana sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video22% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 22% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 2026153x their median

    As if Notre Dame de Paris waited for this moment to "fully" reopen. The crowd of Parisians singing Salve Regina with Pope Leo XIV. Video: Vatican Media https://t.co/6D7Kti2MSk

    14K2.0K90135588K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026120x their median

    Urgente. Queda probado que Petro compró al Congreso. Se confirma plenamente toda la corrupción de la UNGRD. El @consejodeestado acaba de decretar la pérdida de investidura del expresidente del Senado, Iván Name. Durísimo golpe para todos los demás excongresistas y altos exfuncionarios implicados, entre ellos la alta exconsejera Sandra Ortiz.

    7.9K4.0K338140132K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026118x their median

    El Presidente Javier Milei mantuvo una reunión bilateral con el Primer Ministro del Estado de Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, en el marco de su visita oficial a Nueva York. Lo acompañaron el Ministro de Economía, Luis Caputo, y el Canciller, Pablo Quirno. https://t.co/WUEJ0Qrx97

    9.8K1.6K673114391K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202676x their median

    First Lady Melania Trump clinks glasses with President of China Xi Jinping https://t.co/DzT6ZX7dHz

    7.0K69311368472K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202675x their median

    Ojo María José Pizarro! el Consejo de Estado acaba de decretar, en primera instancia, la pérdida de investidura de Iván Name y documentó que, durante el trámite de la reforma pensional, dejó de presidir 14 de las 16 sesiones y permitió que María José Pizarro asumiera la conducción sin una justificación legal o material. El fallo abre preguntas que no pueden quedar en el aire: ¿Fue investigada la actuación de María José Pizarro? ¿Con qué fundamento jurídico presidió esas sesiones? ¿Puede esa conducta tener alguna consecuencia disciplinaria, penal o de pérdida de investidura, si se demuestra que conocía las circunstancias y actuó concertadamente con Name? ¿Se verificó si existió algún acuerdo, coordinación o beneficio derivado de esa actuación? Y, sobre todo: ¿por qué, si estos hechos estaban documentados, no se ha conocido una investigación específica sobre la actuación de la entonces vicepresidenta del Senado? Son preguntas que las autoridades competentes deberían responder con pruebas y no con silencios.

    5.1K2.4K9969112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202673x their median

    🔴 FLASH — Nicolas Sarkozy :« Je ne tutoie pas le Pape et mets encore moins la main sur son épaule, c’est une question d’éducation ! Je l’appelle très Saint-Père ! » #CNews #HDpros #Europe1 https://t.co/4DEwCarSwl

    6.1K1.2K27656180K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202650x their median

    FRANCE 🇫🇷 Church bells ring out as Pope Leo XIV drives through the streets of Paris https://t.co/DaFZHuHJSG

    4.6K481244372K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202638x their median

    Hoy Indalecio Dangond les plantó la verdad en la cara al Pacto Histórico. Les dijo mentirosos. Prometieron 3 millones de hectáreas. Compraron 350 mil, quedaron debiendo más de $1,4 billones y las entregaron sin título. El crédito lo concentraron. Los predios inflados van a investigación. Y la plata de contratos, a inversión: no a calentar silla en Bogotá. Llegó a poner sobre la mesa lo que el Pacto Histórico le vendió a Colombia como reforma agraria y que, en la práctica, terminó siendo propaganda, deuda y tierra sin título. Un aplauso para ese ministro. Así se defiende el campo. Así se defiende la verdad. Así se empieza a gobernar.

    2.7K1.2K451938K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202339x their median

    Momentos mágicos con las ballenas 🐋 🐳 en el Chocó, anualmente las ballenas jorobadas del sur del continente lleguen aquí a parir sus crías. Les comparto esta experiencia. https://t.co/nyPQ5TQNhH

    2.0K3701976231K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202611x their median

    Esta burla a la Humanidad es la consecuencia del conejo al plebiscito https://t.co/I9VbKdwxDu

    66738335146.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#atención#bogotá#cnews#europe1#hdpros

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 103 interactions against 241K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 3.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 153x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #atención, #bogotá, #cnews.

What is Juan Carlos Pastrana's engagement rate on X?
Juan Carlos Pastrana (@jcpastrana) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 241,163 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, Juan Carlos Pastrana sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jcpastrana have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jcpastrana post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going