Back to @jay_mikee's profile

Joshua Mike-Bamiloye engagement report

@jay_mikee - 338K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
1.06%
of 338K followers
Per impression
1.58%
226K views on a typical post
Reach
66.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.16%
360 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 3.6K interactions against 338K followers, an engagement rate of 1.06%. Posts are seen about 226K times each, and 1.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 66.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 8.9x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #abattoir.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.06%, Joshua Mike-Bamiloye sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.499% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 113 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 20268.9x their median

    Ladies…we need to chat https://t.co/sSVtvyF4qF

    26K4.4K613364593K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 20241.9x their median

    Hey! Here are SOME recent MOUNT ZION MOVIES from 2020-2024 with their YouTube links and trailers. Kindly retweet this, let’s bless more lives. How many have you seen? THREAD 🧵🧵🧵🧵 https://t.co/7ZmbaTZXJs

    4.9K1.8K14573387K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    Shazam, but for the Bible. Coming to Pewnote soon. https://t.co/k2ICccDZd7

    3.8K681140105406K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    From the story that many of us grew up watching, to a new generation experiencing it on the big screen. The official trailer for AGBARA NLA: THE RETURN is here. October 1, 2026. In Cinemas nationwide. This time, you have to see it on the big screen. https://t.co/OJ3RzhcfNr

    1.8K490495246K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    Welcome to the Ember months 🔥 https://t.co/TWUJ0Frp59

    1.7K4123314K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 2026

    THE GOSPEL IS FREE. Sharing it with someone, one on one, or a group of people must always be free. But the moment it’s packaged, into a video, an album, a concert, a book, it’ll cost money to produce. Every ‘free’ gospel resource you’ve ever enjoyed was free to you because someone else paid for it. Here’s where some get confused: We treating a concert like a crusade or church service. A crusade is a message pushed hard and wide, on purpose, to reach as many people as possible. You don’t charge for that, same reason you don’t charge admission to a political rally. But a concert is different. Culturally, a concert is entertainment. Ours happens to have the gospel woven through it. Nobody’s charging for the gospel in it, they’re charging for the experience built around it. Should every gospel concert be ticketed? Probably not. Many, if not all, can be free, but ‘free’ isn’t magic, it means somebody already covered the bill. If that somebody isn’t you, you don’t get a say in whether someone else charges. And if you’re saying ‘just trust God to provide’, then let God use you to be the provision. Christian books, movies, concerts, cloths, education, etc aren’t free by default. It happens when God instructs it, someone or an organization is blessed enough to fund it. If you’re telling someone else to trust God for funding, trust Him enough to make you the answer to that prayer. Or, simpler: support the work by buying the ticket.

    1.4K236201638K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 2026

    Hi guys, Following the conversations around selling tickets for gospel events, I’ve taken time to genuinely consider the perspectives that were shared with me. I realized there were angles I hadn’t given enough thought to, and I now understand the issue better than I did when I made my post. Because of that, I’ve deleted the post. I realize I was too quick to make a judgment. It wasn’t my intention to attack or condemn anyone, but I can see how my words came across that way. Looking back, I should have framed it as a question or opened a conversation instead of making a definitive statement. Regarding my book, I also hadn’t considered it from the perspective many of you pointed out. At the time, I was primarily focused on the fellowship and ministry aspect of the conversation, and I wasn’t seeing the broader picture. Hearing your thoughts helped me realize there were angles I hadn’t sufficiently considered. My post was never aimed at any particular gospel artist or minister. In fact, I wasn’t thinking about anyone’s event when I made it. I’m still learning, growing, and allowing my perspectives to be refined, and I’m grateful for the correction. I sincerely apologize to anyone who felt attacked or condemned by my words. That was never my heart. I deeply believe in the ministries of these gospel artists. We are one body in Christ, and I don’t want to contribute to unnecessary division or attacks against one another. Thank you to everyone who engaged respectfully and helped me see things from a different perspective. I appreciate it, and I’ll carry the lessons from this conversation going forward.

    1.1K14212970150K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 2026

    Limited sits available. Be sure to register before the entries close. Visit https://t.co/W9BfOLqs2b https://t.co/6fcT5HEwra

    8211206.8K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 2026

    High keyyyy, I really want to be on Zion Kulture😭 I want to join @jay_mikee , Ife James, Mary and @victor_otegz to talk on anything and also Abattoir review There are so many things I can’t type😭😭😭😂 Plusssssssssss, I am looking forward to the next MZI

    3425112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#abattoir

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.6K interactions against 338K followers, an engagement rate of 1.06%. Posts are seen about 226K times each, and 1.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 66.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 8.9x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Joshua Mike-Bamiloye's engagement rate on X?
Joshua Mike-Bamiloye (@jay_mikee) has an engagement rate of 1.06%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 338,158 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.06%, Joshua Mike-Bamiloye sits above the 75th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jay_mikee have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @jay_mikee post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going