Back to @jasonmdesimone's profile

Jason Desimone ⚔️ engagement report

@jasonmdesimone - 59K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.251%
of 59K followers
Per impression
3.43%
4.3K views on a typical post
Reach
7.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
149
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 59K followers, an engagement rate of 0.251%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 3.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jason Desimone ⚔️'s engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.251%, Jason Desimone ⚔️ sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video37% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 37% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 216 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 13, 202346x their median

    Build until they can’t ignore you https://t.co/57Ekenj3cP

    5.2K75380971571K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.9x their median

    As we approach the release of tradable RWAs on @avax, The Arena is partnering up with @PharaohExchange to release our RWA launchpad! We expect to have this live as soon as tokenized stocks and commodities are officially live on the chain. Here’s what to expect: - Pair tokens with any official RWA offered on Avalanche (no bridging RWAs from other chains) - All graduated tokens will migrate to Pharaoh DEX for continued trading - Improved bonding curve so tokens start with a higher marketcap, leading to better distribution and thicker liquidity - Tax your token from 1-5% with rewards auto distributed to holders in the base token - Creator fees and LP fees still included for projects to build treasuries and tokens to trade healthier at higher marketcaps - Pair tokens with other ERC-20 tokens as well, including $ARENA and AVAX ecosystem memecoins - New UI/UX improvements on The Arena Launchpad - Arena Champions will be airdropped all bonded tokens as part of the Moats program We have some projects lining up to launch, but please remember that no pairing is official until you see an announcement from this account.

    28677551422K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.9x their median

    We have brought on @PolyPup to make our Avalanche RWA launchpad its best version yet. At the same time @DocBadTouch is cooking up an on-chain ponzi that only Time Wonderland could beat. @Bayo0x building out a secret product to go alongside the new Launchpad. Rallying the troops for this next push. This is the one 🫡

    198315437.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20261.9x their median

    I’m making it my personal goal to have all Arena launched Avax memes available to trade on @fomo @seyong please check tg

    207244326.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    One of the craziest things about $COQ that no one ever mentions is that the token has 110,000 holders on chain 🤯 Just absolutely insane distribution. I don’t even know how you guys did that @gribbly_fire @WojakSatoshi

    146263317.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    Things should get interesting this week

    138233603.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    Has there been a memecoin building for as long as $HEFE has been? Got on with @rabisright and had no idea all they’re cooking after two years. I’m bullish

    115224855.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    gArena

    12285633.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    $NOCHILL up 50% $ARENA up 45% Right before $NOCHILL pairing goes live on @TheArenaApp Launchpad. Probably nothing

    139222124.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026

    The red chain may finally be back 🔺 To celebrate, The Arena launchpad will be releasing $NOCHILL pairs early this coming week. Pair any new token on Avalanche with the OG coin that initially spawned from The Arena. There is truly no escape ⚔️ https://t.co/agF4cYXRti

    1372715513K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 149 interactions against 59K followers, an engagement rate of 0.251%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 3.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

What is Jason Desimone ⚔️'s engagement rate on X?
Jason Desimone ⚔️ (@jasonmdesimone) has an engagement rate of 0.251%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 59,079 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.251%, Jason Desimone ⚔️ sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jasonmdesimone have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jasonmdesimone post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going