Back to @jarizabaletaf's profile

Jaime Arizabaleta engagement report

@jarizabaletaf - 318K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.341%
of 318K followers
Per impression
7.81%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
4.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.7/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.341%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 7.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cali, #leyanticapuchosya, #atención.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026. Recurring tags: #cali, #leyanticapuchosya, #atención.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jaime Arizabaleta's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.341%, Jaime Arizabaleta sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 269 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 202617x their median

    ¿EN QUÉ MOMENTO PROFESAR LA FE SE VOLVIÓ PECADO? Si les molesta, lo gritamos más fuerte: ¡QUE VIVA CRISTO REY! https://t.co/k7adUSLRL5

    12K4.0K1.7K228387K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202611x their median

    Encapuchados bloquean la avenida circunvalar en Bogotá en estos momentos. Con el nuevo decreto de protesta del presidente @ABDELAESPRIELLA y del ministro @Rodrigo_Lara_ la intervención de la Fuerza Pública en estos casos es inmediata, protegiendo a los ciudadanos y castigando a los vándalos. El lado correcto historia es ponerle freno a los vándalos que se creen dueños del país.

    8.6K2.7K858179278K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202611x their median

    CEPEDA CONVOCA A MARCHAR A cobrarle a Abelardo 2 meses por los errores de Petro en 4 años ¡Marchan para tapar el escándalo de Verónica Alcocer! https://t.co/YLf9HF3Rph

    8.5K3.1K3654574K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20268.5x their median

    LEY ANTICAPUCHOS YA LEY ANTICAPUCHOS YA LEY ANTICAPUCHOS YA LEY ANTICAPUCHOS YA LEY ANTICAPUCHOS YA LEY ANTICAPUCHOS YA LEY ANTICAPUCHOS YA LEY ANTICAPUCHOS YA

    7.5K1.6K1311846K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20266.8x their median

    Vamos todas y todos a las calles y plazas municipales de Colombia. 14 de Octubre, movilización general del pueblo colombiano hacia el salario mínimo vital, hacia la Vida digna Al Poder Constituyente del pueblo https://t.co/xwA5DqHFsU

    3.7K1.4K2.1K125146K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20266.5x their median

    Petro, aquí tiene su pañuelo: séquese las lágrimas, que no ha parado de llorar por el bendito menor. https://t.co/UeOJHhn0xn

    5.1K1.6K31827113K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20266.3x their median

    Para los que, cada vez que aparece una nueva denuncia contra Gustavo Petro y su entorno, salen a preguntar indignados “¿Y LAS PRUEBAS?”, les voy a refrescar la memoria. Porque aquí no estamos hablando de un chisme de tienda. Estamos hablando de testimonios, grabaciones, interceptaciones, sanciones internacionales, investigaciones penales y actuaciones judiciales que involucran a Gustavo Petro, Verónica Alcocer, Nicolás Petro, Armando Benedetti y a personas de su entorno. Hagamos un breve inventario. Ahí están la revocación de la visa de Petro, la inclusión de los cuatro en la lista OFAC, el video de Petro recibiendo plata en efectivo, los testimonios de Eva Ferrer, las interceptaciones, la carta de Pipe Tuluá, las declaraciones de Nicolás Petro ante la Fiscalía, la entrevista de Juan Fernando Petro y los audios de Armando Benedetti. Ricardo Roa, gerente de la campaña presidencial, fue llamado a juicio por presunta violación de los topes electorales. Dos fiscalías federales estadounidenses, en Manhattan y Brooklyn, examinan posibles vínculos de Petro con narcotraficantes. Nicolás Petro declaró ante la Fiscalía que su padre conocía aportes no reportados de empresarios a la campaña. Laura Sarabia fue imputada penalmente el 14 de septiembre de 2026 por el caso del polígrafo practicado a Marelbys Meza. Y ahora está Angie Rodríguez, quien denunció a Gustavo Petro ante la Comisión de Acusación por presuntas irregularidades y presiones durante su gobierno. Angie también respaldó parte de las declaraciones de Eva Ferrer, denunció haber sufrido agresiones físicas y verbales de Verónica Alcocer y habló de un supuesto “pacto criminal” entre Petro y Verónica para encubrirse mutuamente. Y ahora se suma la entrevista de Eva Ferrer en Semana, en la que acusa a Verónica de haber transportado droga a Venezuela en un avión oficial y de haber regresado a Colombia con 2,5 millones de dólares. Eva también señala presuntos vínculos del entorno de Alcocer con el tráfico de armas. Pero para los fanáticos ninguna denuncia es suficientemente grave, ningún testimonio merece credibilidad y ninguna investigación parece necesaria. Siempre falta algo. Siempre hay una excusa. Siempre hay alguien más a quien echarle la culpa.

    4.4K2.0K25375152K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20264.3x their median

    ¿Quién mató a Miguel Uribe Turbay? ¿Quién mató a Miguel Uribe Turbay? ¿Quién mató a Miguel Uribe Turbay? ¿Quién mató a Miguel Uribe Turbay?

    3.3K9464233733K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.8x their median

    Patéticos https://t.co/1rMMzmXOMs

    3.1K7162442632K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.4x their median

    #BOGOTÁ | Se acabó la etapa de diálogo y llega la fuerza disponible a dispersar la manifestación. Se presentan disturbios con encapuchados. https://t.co/qRQodC5OyZ https://t.co/1OJJxzwIFn

    2.9K5821532571K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cali#leyanticapuchosya#atención#calisosvos#colombia

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.341%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 7.81% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cali, #leyanticapuchosya, #atención.

What is Jaime Arizabaleta's engagement rate on X?
Jaime Arizabaleta (@jarizabaletaf) has an engagement rate of 0.341%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 317,690 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.341%, Jaime Arizabaleta sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jarizabaletaf have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jarizabaletaf post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going