Jam Kamal Khan engagement report
@jam_kamal - 294K followers on X
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 172 interactions against 294K followers, an engagement rate of 0.058%. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 30x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.058%, Jam Kamal Khan sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 3270 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Apr 28, 202630x their median
The first ever High-Level EU–Pakistan Business Forum officially kicked off today! 🇪🇺🇵🇰 Bringing together 1000 business leaders, investors and policymakers from 🇪🇺 Europe and 🇵🇰 Pakistan to boost trade, investment and sustainable growth. 1/4 https://t.co/z60czVR4OT https://t.co/xcNJf8ZFht
- Jun 7, 20263.0x their median
Had a productive meeting with H.E Dr Ahmad bin Mohammed Al Sayed, Minister of State for Foreign Trade Affairs. Discussed overall trade and investment opportunities and exploring avenues for deeper economic collaboration. We also deliberated on the way forward for the Task Force Group to accelerate mutually beneficial outcomes. Looking forward to translating discussions into tangible result
- Oct 17, 2026
I express my grave concern and take serious concern made by Maulana Fazlur Rehman sahib against the state institutions and the government. At a time when Pakistan faces serious economic, security, and geopolitical challenges, responsible political leadership demands restraint, maturity and a commitment to national unity... we all know how our enemies are plotting against our sovereignty in KP and Balochistan. Political differences are an essential part of democracy, and every political leader has the right to question government policies and hold the executive accountable. However, criticism must remain constructive, responsible, and grounded in facts. Statements that undermine national institutions or deepen divisions serve neither democracy nor Pakistan’s national interests. Mohsin naqvi on the house of the floor in very detail explained and pointed out on each step they asked from Ex CM afridi. What was the demand? We only asked that you need to cooperate to fight terrorism, take front lead, ownership both governments be on one page at least to fight terrorism. The Pakistan Army remains a key national institution entrusted with defending the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. And, such demeaning statements at times of war and where so many lives are lost, is nothing but selfishness. Similarly, the government must be allowed to discharge its constitutional responsibilities while remaining accountable to the people and the democratic process. Pakistan needs political stability, institutional harmony, and a shared commitment to addressing the challenges facing its people. Political leadership should rise above partisan interests and contribute to strengthening the state rather than creating further uncertainty and confrontation. Pakistan’s national interest must always take precedence over political expediency, And specially during critical times when we see the region being affected by wars, energy supplies being effected drastically for a country and its people, global economic crises due to instability of connectivity and its inflation. We all know these things very clearly and are seeing what is happening. Differences should be resolved through democratic debate, constitutional means, and dialogue—for which the government not only showed its intent but the prime minister again put his hand forward. Not through rhetoric that risks weakening public confidence in the country’s institutions and destabilising our environment. One place Pakistan is mediating for one the biggest political and war scenario international event, for which every country entrusts upon us. And, on the other hand opposition is leaving no stone unturned for scoring. If Pakistan succeeds in this global negotiation, who will benefit the most. Its gonna be the whole world, the people of these regions who are severely effected, global inflation coming down, supply chains normalising and last but not the least, we all as Pakistani's. You all are witness , how people use to see us before and how they respect a Pakistani today. Let's not play in the hands of those who don't want Pakistan a successful and prosperous country. There is a-lot jealousy and let's not play for meagre gains by loosing the bigger picture.
- Sep 6, 2026
The larger historical picture The history can therefore be broadly understood as follows: Khanate of Kalat Lasbela Princely State Makran Princely State Kharan Princely State British Balochistan / British-administered territories These were not all the same political entity, and they did not all have the same relationship with Britain or with one another. The British themselves maintained different arrangements with these territories. The British Library’s archival catalogue, for example, records separate treaties and engagements involving Kalat, Sibi and British Balochistan, including agreements concerning territory, railways, boundaries and British administrative control. The modern province of Balochistan emerged from these historically different territories and administrative arrangements, particularly following the end of One Unit and the restoration of provincial structures in 1970. Therefore, if the debate is about history, facts and true historical significance. The argument should not be based simply on where the boundary exists today.
- Sep 6, 2026
Governance becomes meaningful only when decision-making, resources and responsibility are brought closer to the people. Communities are better placed to understand their own needs and priorities than a centralised system sitting far away from the people. Fiscal devolution must therefore go hand in hand with administrative and development devolution. It is not enough to transfer responsibilities without transferring the financial resources, authority, institutional capacity and accountability required to deliver them.
- Aug 15, 2026
MERC 1122 since its establishment has been doing a great job and service, but very unfortunate their strength, capacity, requirements n facilities have not been upgraded and improved. We started this service and now many of these employees are facing salary shortages. As we speak, they all are now getting training in islamabad too. I hope the CM and CS will not only solve their salary matter, but improve their budgets, facilitate their centres, establish new places and enhance this whole organisation. @PakSarfrazbugti @cs_balochistan
- Jul 22, 2026
Met with the leadership of Samsung Pakistan and Lucky Group CEO Mohammed Ali Tabba to discuss the future of Pakistan’s mobile manufacturing industry. Samsung to use Pakistan not only as a manufacturing base but also as a regional hub for smartphone exports. We also discussed certified refurbishment, greater local value addition, technology transfer and a policy framework that supports investment, innovation and exports. Pakistan is ready to partner with global technology leaders to create jobs, strengthen industrial capacity and enhance export competitiveness.
- Jun 15, 2026
I warmly welcome the peace agreement reached between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran, a significant step towards regional stability, dialogue, and lasting peace. I commend Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir for Pakistan’s constructive efforts in supporting diplomacy and promoting peace in the region. This development reflects the power of dialogue and international cooperation in resolving conflicts and advancing shared prosperity. Pakistan will continue to play its role in promoting peace, stability, and mutual understanding among nations. Pakistan Hamesha Zindabad 🇵🇰
- Sep 6, 2026
Lasbela — History, Administrative Changes and the Need for Facts If there is going to be a debate about regions and its historical status, then the discussion should be based on history, official records and facts, rather than present-day administrative boundaries. Lasbela has a distinct and important history of its own. It was historically a princely state with its own political and administrative structure. The state emerged as a separate ruling entity in the eighteenth century, and the Jam dynasty continued to rule Lasbela until the state was integrated into Pakistan’s administrative structure after independence. It is also important to understand that the territory now called the Province of Balochistan did not exist in its present constitutional form throughout this history. What is today Balochistan was historically made up of several different political and administrative entities, including the Khanate of Kalat, the princely states of Lasbela, Kharan and Makran, and territories that came under direct British administration and were known as British Balochistan. These entities had different constitutional and political relationships with the British. Lasbela and Kalat Lasbela had a complicated historical relationship with the Khanate of Kalat. At different periods, political and territorial relationships between the Jam of Lasbela and the Khan of Kalat changed. However, Lasbela developed and functioned as a separate princely state, rather than simply being an ordinary district of Kalat. During the British period, Lasbela was one of the princely states associated with the wider Balochistan political system. The British recognized Kalat, Lasbela, Makran and Kharan as separate princely states under British protection, while other territories were directly administered by the British. This distinction is extremely important when discussing the historical map of the region. The British and the creation of “British Balochistan” The British did not simply take over the entire area that we now call Balochistan at one time. Rather, British control developed gradually through different treaties, agreements, leases, military arrangements and administrative decisions. For example, after the Treaty of Gandamak in 1879, areas including Quetta, Pishin and Sibi came under British control. Other territories were subsequently obtained or administered through agreements with the Khan of Kalat. The Bolan Pass, Nushki and Nasirabad are examples of areas whose relationship with the British developed through separate arrangements. The British therefore administered the region through different categories rather than as one uniform territory. Historical research describes the situation around the beginning of the twentieth century as consisting broadly of the native states of Kalat and Lasbela, British Balochistan, and Agency Territories, with some Agency Territories having been obtained on lease from Kalat while others were administered through separate arrangements with tribal authorities. Therefore, it is historically inaccurate to look at today’s provincial map and assume that the same administrative boundaries existed a hundred or two hundred years ago. What happened after independence? After Pakistan came into being in 1947, the former princely states did not immediately become ordinary districts of a province in the way we know them today. Lasbela acceded to Pakistan and retained its separate identity for a period. From 1952 to 1955, it was part of the Baluchistan States Union, along with other former princely states, while retaining elements of its internal administrative identity.
- Jun 6, 2026
Exploiting divisions between the Baloch and Pashtun communities for political gain is not only unethical but represents the lowest form of political opportunism. Such a recent move by Achaqzai appears to be aimed at creating divisions and for political gains only.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 172 interactions against 294K followers, an engagement rate of 0.058%. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 30x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Jam Kamal Khan's engagement rate on X?
- Jam Kamal Khan (@jam_kamal) has an engagement rate of 0.058%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 294,317 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.058%, Jam Kamal Khan sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @jam_kamal have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @jam_kamal post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.