Back to @jakeshieldsajj's profile

Jake Shields engagement report

@jakeshieldsajj - 911K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.172%
of 911K followers
Per impression
2.72%
58K views on a typical post
Reach
6.33%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.113%
65 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 911K followers, an engagement rate of 0.172%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 2.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.33% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jake Shields's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.172%, Jake Shields sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 219 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 202656x their median

    All you will ever need to know about Islamโ€ฆ https://t.co/EeWTnKVgUY

    70K13K3.7K476897K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202644x their median

    9/11 is the only time we lost 4 black boxes from the Twin Towers crash Flight 93 is the only crash in American history that left no aeroplane wreckage Despite all of this, the FBI recovered 4 passports belonging to terrorists No passports of other passengers were recovered

    56K11K9973051.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202626x their median

    ๐—š๐—˜๐—ข๐—ฅ๐—š๐—˜ ๐—›. ๐—ช. ๐—•๐—จ๐—ฆ๐—› was in a meeting with ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—”๐— ๐—” ๐—•๐—œ๐—ก ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐——๐—˜๐—กโ€™๐—ฆ ๐—•๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ง๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ at the ๐—ฅ๐—œ๐—ง๐—ญ-๐—–๐—”๐—ฅ๐—Ÿ๐—ง๐—ข๐—ก Hotel in Washington on ๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—ฃ๐—ง๐—˜๐— ๐—•๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฌ, ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿญ. @grok yes no

    35K5.7K3362143.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202621x their median

    Another video has surfaced of a man being ejected from a Trump rally in South Carolina days ago-for wearing a 'Kill Your Local Pedophile' t-shirt and saying "You sold us out to Jews and Israel" https://t.co/QBSCLTxK5Y

    27K4.6K966243603K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 202619x their median

    BREAKING: Dutch spies hacked Jared Kushner's iPhone and watched him access a Dubai bank account holding hundreds of millions funneled from Azerbaijan, part of at least $2 billion MBS and MBZ placed for him after he promised to push their agenda with Trump, per a Vanity Fair excerpt. "Jared was looking for shortcuts in his diplomacy. He promised MBZ that he'd push their agenda with Trump if they participated in a fund. He wanted normalization with Israel so that business could take off," a source who knew the arrangement said. The money was meant to redraw the region's map and lock in normalization with Israel. Roughly $1 billion of it was deposited in Israel's Central Bank for Kushner, with Netanyahu requiring dual-key approval on any transfers. The two royals initially discussed more than $10 billion for a shared slush fund. That narrowed to roughly $2 billion deposited into accounts Kushner could access, including roughly $750 million at First Abu Dhabi Bank under a UAE charity used as cover for covert operations. The reveal comes as Kushner is deeply involved in Iran war diplomacy, where Iran has accused him and Steve Witkoff of pocketing $9 billion through market manipulation, using insider knowledge of the talks to trade oil futures, energy stocks, and prediction markets.

    24K4.6K3102591.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202617x their median

    Israeli soldiers testified that in 1948 they smashed Palestinian childrenโ€™s skulls with sticks until they died. @grok yes or no.

    21K5.4K191155943K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202613x their median

    9:47am -United 93 Flight Attendant CeeCee Lyles calls her husband Lorne to inform him they are being hijacked. But she does a curious thing at the end. As she's hanging up, CeeCee stalls for a moment and whispers her final words: "it's a frame." CeeCee's husband notes that it struck him odd for her to be calling from a cell phone. At the time of her call United 93 was allegedly at 20,000 ft. You do the math.

    17K3.7K6821592.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202612x their median

    This is one of the funniest videos you will ever see Its a Japanese news segment and in Japan they don't care about racism or antisemitism They are trying to determine if there ancient demons the Tengu are actually just jews https://t.co/azZ7upqWNT

    15K2.8K225103253K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202611x their median

    Women accounted for 98% of U.S. job gains in August, per FORTUNE

    15K1.1K7355983.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 202610x their median

    Hey @grok, is this true?? Some data centers now run on lab-grown human brain neurons derived from stem cells, wired directly to silicon chips via electrode arrays, and kept alive on life support. Fed sugar every few days. They play Doom. We donโ€™t know if theyโ€™re conscious.

    12K3.3K5567471.1M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.6K interactions against 911K followers, an engagement rate of 0.172%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 2.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.33% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

What is Jake Shields's engagement rate on X?
Jake Shields (@jakeshieldsajj) has an engagement rate of 0.172%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 910,887 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.172%, Jake Shields sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jakeshieldsajj have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @jakeshieldsajj post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going