Back to @jaimenebotsaadi's profile

Jaime Nebot 🇪🇨 engagement report

@jaimenebotsaadi - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.186%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
1.38%
149K views on a typical post
Reach
13.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
72 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.186%. Posts are seen about 149K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.186%, Jaime Nebot 🇪🇨 sits above the 50th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.141% to 0.671%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,870 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 347 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 1, 20261.9x their median

    Sobre una declaración mentirosa. Como estoy en mi sano juicio, no me refiero a las personas basado en "lo que me han contado y nunca vi". Quien traicionó a Guayaquil fue quien reemplazó a la mayoría de funcionarios capaces y experimentados por ineptos y principiantes; quien convirtió una bonanza financiera en una quiebra virtual; quien redujo una obra física y social gigantesca a su mínima expresión; y quien transformó en decepción la autoestima de los guayaquileños. Por respeto a una antigua amistad me había limitado a decir que su postulación fue un error. Su declaración mentirosa me ha obligado a decir en qué consistió.

    3.0K7986222292K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 2025

    https://t.co/avVqpCDFJQ

    1.3K1570229K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 2025

    https://t.co/oYqYYpKs65

    1.0K430238K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2025

    "La luz de la Aurora Gloriosa es permanente"

    6711280141177K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 2025

    https://t.co/9F8j152OsO

    885270233K viewsView on X
  • Nov 12, 2025

    No acostumbro a ofender ni a dejarme ofender. Jamás, como abogado o funcionario público, utilicé la Judicatura para perseguir a nadie ni para beneficiar a terceros o a mí. Es cierto que Pablo Muentes (quien, además, no ha sido sentenciado en última instancia) no debe ser tratado como un detenido peligroso. Para decir eso, Rafael Correa —a quien sí califican de capo— no debió recurrir a la mentira. La serenidad y la caballerosidad se forjan antes de llegar al poder y se demuestran después de dejarlo.

    53887091218K viewsView on X
  • Nov 16, 2025

    https://t.co/vnuRasaOEw

    5369704170K viewsView on X
  • Feb 15, 2026

    🚨 AUDIO FALSO De acuerdo con prácticas y estándares de verificación de hechos utilizados por iniciativas de fact-checking y análisis digital, el audio que circula en redes sociales —en el que se atribuyen declaraciones a Aquiles Álvarez y en el que se menciona a Jaime Nebot— no es auténtico y presenta características compatibles con contenido manipulado o generado mediante inteligencia artificial. 🔎 Antes de compartir, siempre verifica con fuentes confiables y chequeadores de hechos que analicen contexto, origen y autenticidad del material. Iniciativas de fact-checking se encargan de desmentir información engañosa y fomentar la verificación rigurosa. #AudioFalso

    36711001963K viewsView on X
  • Nov 12, 2025

    Ahhh… Ahora se refiere al Partido Social Cristiano… El Mashi ya aterrizó. Más allá de las leyendas negras, en el PSC, como en toda organización, hay personas que actúan de diferentes maneras. ¿En RC5 no? ¡Los corruptos son los que son!

    33160043165K viewsView on X
  • Nov 8, 2025

    ¿Desmemoriados? https://t.co/G10fbNwIPU

    24710202414K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.186%. Posts are seen about 149K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Jaime Nebot 🇪🇨's engagement rate on X?
Jaime Nebot 🇪🇨 (@jaimenebotsaadi) has an engagement rate of 0.186%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,113,151 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.186%, Jaime Nebot 🇪🇨 sits above the 50th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @jaimenebotsaadi have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @jaimenebotsaadi post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going