Back to @iwaken44's profile

相互フォロー支援:湯浅健/自己肯定感の研究者:フォロバ100%FollowBack engagement report

@iwaken44 - 70K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 17, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.022%
of 70K followers
Per impression
1.28%
1.2K views on a typical post
Reach
1.69%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
15
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 70K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 9% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 347x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 17, 2026. Recurring tag: #自己肯定感.

Compared with accounts its own size

相互フォロー支援:湯浅健/自己肯定感の研究者:フォロバ100%FollowBack's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.022%, 相互フォロー支援:湯浅健/自己肯定感の研究者:フォロバ100%FollowBack sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video9% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 9% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 121 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 30, 2019347x their median

    自己肯定感とは 高垣忠一郎先生が提唱 ありのままの自分が自分であって大丈夫という感覚 何かができるから良い・何者であるから素晴らしい:浅い自己肯定感 何もできなくても良い・何者でなくても素晴らしい:深い自己肯定感 心的深層における自発的な自己の存在に対する無条件の肯定的な感情・状態

    3.7K1.2K23644View on X
  • Jul 24, 202628x their median

    公認心理師を名乗って心理支援を広報する以上、利用者が資格の有無や責任の所在を確認できることは、安心と信頼を守るための最低限の条件です。実名を示さず資格のみを掲げる発信は、専門職としての説明責任の点から慎重であるべきです。資格の透明性を確保する姿勢が求められます。 https://t.co/3atdkeCJrm

    3357151129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20192.1x their median

    ボクの教え子の湯浅くんと話しています。自己肯定感について話しています。ツイッターの登録について教えてもらい、ツイッターを始めることにしました。よろしくお願いします。

  • Aug 25, 20261.9x their median

    日本人に多い謎の片頭痛や抑うつっぽい不調は、 幼少期からのお茶文化やコーヒー、紅茶、清涼飲料などによる 無自覚のカフェイン依存の離脱症状が相当あると思う。 大人が自覚して飲むのは自己責任だが 知らずに子どもを依存にするのは罪。

    252101.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20261.7x their median

    子どもの自己肯定感を高めるには「成功体験を積み重ねる」 なんて、まことしやかに言われるけど。 本当の自己肯定感は、親がその体験を 子どもと一緒に何かをして喜んだり、失敗を悲しんだり、 心を深く思いやること。 そうした日々を積み重ねる事。 別に成功体験でなくても構わない。 逆に金を出して成功体験の教室やスクールに行かせるだけでは、 本当の自己肯定感は育たない。

    240201.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.6x their median

    多くの人が自己肯定感と思っているもの 学歴、地位、筋肉、美貌、財産は 死の間際に価値をなくす。 それでも人は空っぽにもならない。 本当の自己が残る。 むき出しの自分。 若い時にはなかなか気付けないが 命や人生の危機にあらわになる。 #自己肯定感

    203101.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    小さな子どもにとって本当に大事なのは 高いおもちゃでも可愛い服でも大きな家でもなく 抱っこと笑顔とおしゃべりなんだよね。 #自己肯定感

    201001.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026

    「ありのままの自分で大丈夫」と思い込むのは、惜しいけど本当の自己肯定感じゃない。 教義や定義や心がけや格言ではないから。 大事な人に大事にされた経験が積み重なって、 心の深いところから自然に湧いてくる「感情」なんだ。 #自己肯定感

    191101.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 2026

    「子育てって結局は親の自己満足」 これに共感するようでは、子どもの自己肯定感は難しい。 子どものために何をしてあげた、 どんな環境を用意した、 が終わりじゃなく。 子どもがどんな感情だったか?が本質。 子どもの「心の」声を聞く事がとても大事。

    190101.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    「自己肯定感」は「自己+肯定+感」の複合語。 英語だとよく self-esteem や self-affirmation と言われるが、 これらは「感」に当たる部分がない。 概念として内包されているらしい。 内包は日本語も同じだが、あえて「感」を付けているところに独自性がある気がする。 どう思う?

    170001.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#自己肯定感

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 70K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.68% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 9% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.2K interactions, about 347x its own typical post.

What is 相互フォロー支援:湯浅健/自己肯定感の研究者:フォロバ100%FollowBack's engagement rate on X?
相互フォロー支援:湯浅健/自己肯定感の研究者:フォロバ100%FollowBack (@iwaken44) has an engagement rate of 0.022%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 70,051 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.022%, 相互フォロー支援:湯浅健/自己肯定感の研究者:フォロバ100%FollowBack sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iwaken44 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iwaken44 post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going