Back to @ivanlapanje's profile

BorasLegend engagement report

@ivanlapanje - 108K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
2.70%
of 108K followers
Per impression
1.52%
192K views on a typical post
Reach
177.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
60 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 2.70%. Posts are seen about 192K times each, and 1.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 177.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 105K interactions, about 36x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.70%, BorasLegend sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 268 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 6, 202636x their median

    Red cards are not overturned by political phone calls. They are overturned by rules, evidence and independent bodies. If a U.S. President intervenes with the FIFA President — and a player is suddenly cleared before a World Cup knockout match — the question is unavoidable: Quo vadis, FIFA? Football must never become a playground for political power. #FIFA #WorldCup #GianniInfantino #DonaldTrump

    78K16K4.2K7.2K18M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202634x their median

    Imagine being Gonçalo Ramos. A man in his physical prime. You score the winner against Croatia with a ridiculous header. And your reward is 0 minutes in the next game. Actually quite unbelievable.

    93K5.8K3282001.6M viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 20267.0x their median

    No penalty for Ghana after that tackle? African teams are too humble, that’s their biggest weakness. Another player would’ve rolled around five times and screamed so the whole stadium could hear, forcing the ref to check VAR and see the clear penalty.

    17K2.7K12366312K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20266.9x their median

    It was a good run bro https://t.co/THEo8qpirL

    20K2671422724K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.3x their median

    EA Sports is falling off gradually 💔 https://t.co/U551CUAIpD

    15K455166953.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20264.4x their median

    The summary of this game is that Luka Modrić is the greatest midfielder we ever had the privilege to witness. Thank you for everything, Captain.

    12K1.2K4515132K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20262.9x their median

    Messi at 39. I can't believe what I just witnessed. 90 minutes in 30 celsius vs one of the most physical teams out there. What can you even say? The greatest athlete of all time. No one is even close. We thought Qatar was the pinnacle. But somehow, he’s doing it all again.

    7.8K584572131K viewsView on X
  • Jan 16, 20261.9x their median

    We are aware of an issue where LALIGA POTM Lamine Yamal was unintentionally included as part of the Flashback Sophia Wilson SBC reward. This has been updated to the intended rewards.

    4.1K701.1K1612.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20261.8x their median

    Ultimate Team has never been about realism. Throw 1958 Pelé into today's football and he'd probably be a bronze item. Still, he's a top 3 item in FC 27. In the same way you can't compare men and women. Different biologics, different economics. Ratings and in-game performance should be relative to a player's era and gender. The problem isn’t what’s between the legs, but how the game is coded. Since FIFA 22 (next-gen), the game has heavily favored small, agile attackers, which, of course, happens to benefit female players more. It’s not about gender: it’s about finding a better balance between different player builds. A small, extremely agile player shouldn’t also have tremendous strength. You can VERY rarely have both (unless you are Messi). It creates a misbalance that is this year more obvious than ever.

    4.9K15221040302K viewsView on X
  • Dec 4, 2025

    On the morning of the First Advent Sunday, my Squad Battles army finally multiplied. ❤️❤️ https://t.co/7Var65vh84

    3.7K311322108K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 2.70%. Posts are seen about 192K times each, and 1.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 177.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 105K interactions, about 36x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is BorasLegend's engagement rate on X?
BorasLegend (@ivanlapanje) has an engagement rate of 2.70%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 108,065 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.70%, BorasLegend sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ivanlapanje have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ivanlapanje post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going