Back to @itzjoshuajake's profile

Joshua Jake engagement report

@itzjoshuajake - 111K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.038%
of 111K followers
Per impression
0.664%
6.4K views on a typical post
Reach
5.72%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
42
interactions (median)
Saved
0.031%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 42 interactions against 111K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 0.664% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 345K interactions, about 8211x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Joshua Jake's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.038%, Joshua Jake sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 314 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 8, 20248211x their median

    The Trump Effect Is Insane 🇺🇸 https://t.co/P4vICxuHqq

    269K64K5.4K6.5K89M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202670x their median

    The “Free Palestine” movement is the new “Black Lives Matter” movement.

    2.2K10061135146K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202650x their median

    Elizabeth Warren - "The Clarity Act is insulting to the American people" That's fine @SenWarren - don't have clarity, don't have regulation. Then all of the 'criminals' and 'terrorists' can continue to do what they've been doing over the past 17 years. You can't ban Bitcoin. You can't stop it. You either embrace it or you lose. Elizabeth Warren's choice is for America to lose. She'd rather see America lose to spite Donald Trump than to see America prosper. That's the definition of 'loser mentality' right there. Today, we'll see if the rest of the Senate are losers too....

    1.5K19937530133K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202624x their median

    Created 70 US manufacturing jobs so far this month

    9332033872K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202621x their median

    Democrats hate America. That was proven today with the Clarity Act.

    7715649210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202614x their median

    Which Crypto is a better hold? 👑 $XRP or $LINK https://t.co/zjyeVz06qj

    46823107537K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20269.7x their median

    Alex Jones is talking about $XRP now? I’m fucking out.

    28912103390K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20269.4x their median

    BREAKING: 🚨 THIS APP IS LITERALLY TURNING TRADING INTO AN ESPORT AND MAKING MILLIONAIRES. I’M ADDICTED. $XRP $LINK $ONDO $HYPE $USAR https://t.co/8QKwPdH2cO

    3103847141K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20266.4x their median

    JUST IN:🇺🇸 Scott Bessent Confirms The United States has Completely Check Mated Iran He predicts Iran's economy will collapse "probably within the next 2 weeks." "They're going to make their final deliveries of oil to China, and then they will have NOTHING." Hamiltonian Economics at its finest.

    2281920234K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20266.0x their median

    Hunter Biden is a crack head. What did you expect?

    210832214K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 42 interactions against 111K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 0.664% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 345K interactions, about 8211x its own typical post.

What is Joshua Jake's engagement rate on X?
Joshua Jake (@itzjoshuajake) has an engagement rate of 0.038%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 111,444 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.038%, Joshua Jake sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @itzjoshuajake have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @itzjoshuajake post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going