Back to @itskac's profile

Kelly Ann Collins engagement report

@itskac - 246K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.009%
of 246K followers
Per impression
1.40%
1.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
21
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video, 23% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 106x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #unga81, #bitcoin, #womenintech.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #unga81, #bitcoin, #womenintech.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kelly Ann Collins's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, Kelly Ann Collins sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,985 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,985 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,906 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 290 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 2026106x their median

    I asked 100 Harvard students about Bitcoin.... this is NOT what I expected. https://t.co/BLot13SMo1

    1.8K25615470217K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202676x their median

    🚨After spending 9 years in Bitcoin, I hate to admit it, but I was wrong.🚨 SELF CUSTODY IS DEAD 1,300 Bitcoin was stolen from Coldcard, so now I'm putting all my Bitcoin in BlackRock and Coinbase. The track record of centralized institutions is great. 📉FTX stole 100,000 Bitcoin in 2022 📉Voyager - 65,000 Bitcoin in 📉Blockfi - 75,000 Bitcoin in 2022 📉Celsius - 235,000 Bitcoin 📉Quadriga - 60,000 Bitcoin 📉Mt Gox - 700,000 Bitcoin in 2013 📉Genesis - 150,000 Bitcoin 📉3AC - 175,000 Bitcoin I am absolutely flabbergasted at the amount of people proclaiming self custody is dead. Yes, what happened to Coldcard was horrible, but PERSPECTIVE is everything! NOT YOUR KEYS NOT YOUR COINS

    1.2K18220059216K viewsView on X
  • Jan 28, 202634x their median

    It was great meeting with Commisioner @HesterPeirce and other members of the @SECGov today. Very optimistic about the future of crypto. https://t.co/LYFVy3F11L

    5076111724169K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20264.6x their median

    My new assistant just quit - because my schedule is too busy. I thought that is why people needed assistants? 👀🫠🙈 She said she will come back when I am not so busy. Nice girl. But I don’t think she knows who the heck I am. Won’t happen - lol. Bless her heart. 🧡 This life ain’t for the faint. Nothing can stop us, I’m all the way up! 📸: Me, blowing kisses to James from a random hotel somewhere in Europe last week. 😄

    78314131K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20261.8x their median

    At @CanadaCryptoWk, we were all reaching new heights.✨ Not just on a rooftop 44 stories above Toronto, but in what we’re building together. Tune in now: Our @Futurist_conf 2026 recap is live! @SheCryptoHQ | @NewFriendTech https://t.co/ialka9jqZu

    2241101.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.7x their median

    Bitcoin Corporate Day ~ London Edition ~ was amazing! ⚡️ Great conversations, sharp ideas, and a room full of people thinking about the future of business. The energy? Bullish. We came, we saw, we ₿itcoined. 🚀 https://t.co/sOyDDvpAf9

    246501.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.5x their median

    Honored to share that I have been selected to be a Featured Speaker for the next cohort of Women of Web3 (WoW3) at the United Nations 81st Science Summit! The WoW3 session, titled “Resilience Through Decentralization: Women in Web3 Building Digital Equity,” will take place virtually, on Friday, September 18, 2026, at 11 a.m ET. Join us on this global stage as we address the power of blockchain technology and ways to shape the digital landscape together. RSVP NOW ➡️ https://t.co/Dqa2wyhERq #ScienceSummit2026 #UNGA81

    250521.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    Zoom meetings lately be like: 🎧🎡🏰👑😄 📷: @laissu https://t.co/VeLjzvfLKN

    252312.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 2026

    Day 1 ✔️ What a start! So excited to be in Toronto for @CanadaCryptoWk and @untraceableinc Blockchain Futurist Conference. Day 1 was a success, filled with great conversations, familiar faces, new connections, and plenty of energy. Now let’s keep it going. 🎉 See you tomorrow! 🇨🇦✨ #CanadaCryptoWeek #Futurist26

    175402.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    Excited to join @BlockConGlobal in Punta Cana this November! Looking forward to connecting with leaders across industries, and sharing ideas around technology, innovation, opportunity, and impact. 🌎✨ https://t.co/UW4K9jcHL7

    152411.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#unga81#bitcoin#womenintech

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video, 23% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 106x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #unga81, #bitcoin, #womenintech.

What is Kelly Ann Collins's engagement rate on X?
Kelly Ann Collins (@itskac) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 246,293 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, Kelly Ann Collins sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,985 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @itskac have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @itskac post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going