RUTH ξ¨π¨π¦ engagement report
@it_Rutie - 391K followers on X
Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.505%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 4.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 139K interactions, about 71x its own typical post.
Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
RUTH ξ¨π¨π¦'s engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.505%, RUTH ξ¨π¨π¦ sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 91% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 103 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 1, 202671x their median
Davido has no idea what he just did for the Twitter community. ππ₯ https://t.co/uB3naKsCDn
- Nov 11, 202517x their median
Iβm representing Nigeria in the βNew Day educationβ international journalistic competition. π₯° https://t.co/eIjmODCSAQ
- Aug 30, 202612x their median
Ojo really told Davrel what everybody was thinking. π βYou no sabi talk, na money make you meet us.β https://t.co/vCzae3gqy7
- Sep 10, 20269.8x their median
Apple launch am yesterday, Ikeja don sell am today. π Nigerians no dey ever disappoint. ππ₯ https://t.co/3KRELq0RGe
- Sep 30, 20267.4x their median
Achraf Hakimi don teach boys street OT. ππ₯ https://t.co/udJGV8Bjtb
- Aug 29, 20267.2x their median
If this appears on your timeline. May everything good align in your favor. https://t.co/zyH6VYFuxq
- Aug 30, 20266.7x their median
Osimhen played like his rent was due. ππ₯ https://t.co/B7pEZwmblp
- Sep 10, 20266.3x their median
iShowSpeed really went from streaming in his room to attending the World Cup and Apple events with CEOs. ππ₯ Bro is living a different life. https://t.co/Gx9i4ACR7t
- Sep 10, 20266.1x their median
50 Cent says a billionaire offered him $2 MILLION to feature on his 13-year-old sonβs song. π $2M for ONE feature? π€― https://t.co/ig64mRAyIk
- Sep 10, 20265.6x their median
Hi @burnaboy, I dare you to recreate. https://t.co/CDFsqmL5Se
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.505%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 4.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 139K interactions, about 71x its own typical post.
- What is RUTH ξ¨π¨π¦'s engagement rate on X?
- RUTH ξ¨π¨π¦ (@it_Rutie) has an engagement rate of 0.505%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 391,335 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.505%, RUTH ξ¨π¨π¦ sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @it_Rutie have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @it_Rutie post?
- Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.83 posts per day across the measured window.