Rio engagement report
@isthatRioo - 177K followers on X
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 177K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 1.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 348x its own typical post.
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026. Recurring tag: #chinesecouple.
Compared with accounts its own size
Rio's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.032%, Rio sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.68% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 83% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 81 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Mar 22, 2026348x their median
What the fck was that https://t.co/4765W3sbn7
- Jun 20, 2026178x their median
CARLY CUSSING?!!!?!!! THIS IS NO LONGER FOR CHILDREN 😳 https://t.co/scikEtDz3r
- Sep 3, 2026166x their median
Cinna knew EXACTLY what she was doing when she threw cake on camera👀😳 https://t.co/aFGx1ShVem
- Sep 5, 2026148x their median
Valkyrae BEATS UP Cinna after she touches her hair with smelly socks 😭💀 https://t.co/jFJxHdiUeC
- Sep 6, 202655x their median
StableRonaldo realized there were levels to being rich after seeing the AMP car collections and immediately decided he needed a new car 🤣😭 https://t.co/SLtiD0rRwZ
- Sep 6, 202655x their median
When Cinna started crushing on the gooners qho were flooding her DMs after she posted swimsuit pics 😭 https://t.co/pDrpDiNCP3
- Sep 1, 202545x their median
Yo, what happened to The Rock!? https://t.co/CeZbLSwsBE
- Jan 29, 202615x their median
Tears Giannis could’ve easily bagged Sophie Rain but chose this https://t.co/GXeqeQujuP
- Oct 7, 202613x their median
Shit is frying me man😭😭😭 he beat the SHIT outta him LMAOOOOOOOO https://t.co/OVvQafHAXF
- Mar 23, 202613x their median
Being a billionaire and marrying THAT is insane ngl https://t.co/3KURhmrTrZ
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 56 interactions against 177K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 1.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 348x its own typical post.
- What is Rio's engagement rate on X?
- Rio (@isthatRioo) has an engagement rate of 0.032%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 177,091 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.032%, Rio sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @isthatRioo have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @isthatRioo post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.