Back to @iqsolita's profile

=͟͟͞♡~Verit0 🔥 engagement report

@iqsolita - 63K followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.177%
of 63K followers
Per impression
6.32%
1.8K views on a typical post
Reach
2.80%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
112
interactions (median)
Saved
0.226%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 112 interactions against 63K followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 6.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 94K interactions, about 839x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nuevafotodeperfil, #nilosueñes.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #nuevafotodeperfil, #nilosueñes.

Compared with accounts its own size

=͟͟͞♡~Verit0 🔥's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.177%, =͟͟͞♡~Verit0 🔥 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 287 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 22, 2026839x their median

    Todos somos iguales ante la ley, ¿No? @Claudiashein https://t.co/kUfEE6KmD7

    86K8.1K10744635K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202645x their median

    Una influencer europea, acaba de romper todo, en un en vivo dijo lo siguiente “Yo quiero mucho a los ecuatorianos, pero nunca serán mejor que los mexicanos, no es lo mismo decir, me case con un ecuatoriano a que con un mexicano, por que andar con un mexicano por lo menos es seguridad de que nunca te va a faltar nada” Esto causó revuelo en redes sociales y rompió las redes en un instante con millones de visualizaciones y opiniones… MÉXICO MEJOR QUE ECUADOR

    4.3K47026122201K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202622x their median

    https://t.co/EQFPHevwUZ

    427452.0K4166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202616x their median

    LA TEORÍA DE LA SILLA Hubo un momento en mi vida en el que alguien me habló de la teoría de la silla. No fue una charla larga ni solemne, pero me cambió la forma de entender mis relaciones… y mi lugar en ellas. Desde entonces, dejé de preguntarme por qué tenía que esforzarme tanto para encajar. La teoría es sencilla, pero incómodamente honesta: todas las personas tienen una mesa en su vida. Y cuando alguien te valora de verdad, no duda en sacarte una silla. Te hacen espacio sin que lo pidas. Te miran cuando llegas. Se mueven, se acomodan, te incluyen. Tu presencia no se discute, no se negocia, no se pone a prueba. Simplemente es bienvenida. Pero también existen otras mesas. Mesas donde te dejan de pie. Donde tu presencia parece estorbar. Donde te observan como si tuvieras que demostrar que mereces sentarte. Mesas donde tienes que encogerte, callarte o esperar… para no incomodar. Y aquí viene la verdad que cuesta aceptar: si tienes que pedir tu silla una y otra vez, si tienes que insistir para ser visto, si tienes que esforzarte para no quedar fuera… el problema no eres tú. Estás en la mesa equivocada. No luches por espacios donde te tratan como un añadido. No supliques atención donde tu ausencia no cambiaría nada. No te quedes donde tu presencia incomoda. Ve donde tu presencia suma. Ve donde tu lugar está claro incluso cuando no hablas. Ve donde tu silla ya está puesta. Porque tu silla existe. Y no tienes que ganártela. Solo tienes que sentarte en la mesa correcta.

    1.3K501213143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20269.7x their median

    🫣☕️ https://t.co/wSAeUv8LlD

    322377062061K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20264.7x their median

    estoy en un dilema.... https://t.co/MUpryQaxzx

    239212491617K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.6x their median

    https://t.co/P54Dd3ivMU

    33854266.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.0x their median

    “Gracias por aparecer un día cualquiera y cambiar mi mundo para siempre.” #NuevaFotoDePerfil https://t.co/WQJtMdcKx7

    296212003.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.6x their median

    Excelente Sabado #NuevaFotoDePerfil https://t.co/x8nYpEjmto

    260151803.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.6x their median

    Una señorita decidió subir un video exponiendo a un vato “que le cayó gordo” Empezó contando que estaba conociendo a un chico, estaban hablando sobre viajes y al chico se le ocurrió decirle: 💬 “Entonces te debo un viaje y un pan jeje” Al parecer la chica se sintió ofendida por lo del pan, porque mientras leía eso puso una cara de fuchi... Continuó leyendo su conversación, y el chavo le puso: 💬 “Tú dices cuándo paso por ti, yo invito y yo pago” Ahí la morra se empezó a reír en plan de burla: 🗣️ “¿Pues qué esperabas, preciosísimo? ¿Qué esperabas?” Según ella, ya no supo qué contestarle y mejor lo dejó en visto. Al día siguiente el vato volvió a escribirle: 💬 “Buenos días, mejores días, porque buenos sería conocerte en persona para invitarte un elote con chile”. Y cuando la morra leyó lo del elote con chile se empezó a burlar, diciendo que ese no debería ser el primer mensaje que le mandas a una persona que estás conociendo. La morra lo volvió a dejar en visto y ya no le contestó hasta la noche, y solo para decirle que estaba ocupada. El vato, bien buena onda, le respondió que no se preocupara y después volvió a escribirle, preguntándole si ya había comido. Hasta se ofreció a mandarle comida, pero como pasaron las horas y no tuvo respuesta borró esos mensajes y nada más dejó: 💬 “¿Ya comiste?” Y la morra: 🗣️ “O sea, wey, ¿pa’ qué los borra si obviamente ya los vi?” Al final la morra terminó diciendo que ella estaba ocupada en sus cosas y que qué era eso de invitarla por un “pinche elote o un pan”. Y cerró con: 🗣️ “Agarra el pedo, kbrón”. La cosa aquí es que el chico lo estaba intentando, mientras la morra le respondía cada que quería. Tan fácil que era dejarle claro que no estaba interesada y ya. Pero le gustaba tener su atención o, como dicen en mi pueblo, le gustaba tenerlo de su pendejo. Porque hoy en día mostrar interés es visto como una debilidad. Este chico lo hizo y terminaron exponiéndolo en redes. Y es así como un hombre que era atento y detallista deja de serlo. 🥀 Bro, grabó el video, lo editó, lo vio y aun así pensó que era buena idea subirlo.

    20629431318K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nuevafotodeperfil#nilosueñes

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 112 interactions against 63K followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 6.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 94K interactions, about 839x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nuevafotodeperfil, #nilosueñes.

What is =͟͟͞♡~Verit0 🔥's engagement rate on X?
=͟͟͞♡~Verit0 🔥 (@iqsolita) has an engagement rate of 0.177%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 63,348 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.177%, =͟͟͞♡~Verit0 🔥 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iqsolita have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iqsolita post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going