Back to @inversebrah's profile

smolting (@wassie) engagement report

@inversebrah - 710K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 710K followers
Per impression
0.691%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
2.15%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
105
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.43/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 105 interactions against 710K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.691% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 113K interactions, about 1080x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

smolting (@wassie)'s engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, smolting (@wassie) sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,225 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 91 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 20261080x their median

    Who the fuck is legitimately watching mr. beast videos

    108K3.6K1.7K4132.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026166x their median

    A man has been charged with killing his cousin after an argument over enchiladas The disagreement started when he claimed his food was spicier than his cousin's https://t.co/aWw9wyYxTm

    16K570269218576K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026117x their median

    We just made two HUGE changes to Pumpfun We’re INTRODUCING Holder Rewards and REMOVING Cashback mode Now, Holder Reward tokens pay out rewards just by holding: for longer hold times, higher ceilings & communities that thrive https://t.co/Chq1MhsZkD

    8.1K1.1K2.0K1.1K3.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202653x their median

    you have to fumble generational entries a few times so you recognize the same spots later and hold

    4.7K41741995198K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202645x their median

    JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇨🇳 Ex-Google engineer sentenced to one year in US prison after stealing AI trade secrets for China. https://t.co/ZW1YtbNQ3p

    3.9K48724482618K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202627x their median

    i can’t believe there are “aura battles” going on in every city. how did kids today get so damn lame? i don’t remember this type of cringe happening before. https://t.co/cHMrKR5qys

    2.1K654232561.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202619x their median

    We’re entering a period of peak financial nihilism and degeneracy. Crypto is rapidly becoming the land of wolves, where anything goes. It’s become socially acceptable to rug, scam, or “PvE” people through new and novel scam financial instuments.

    1.7K9914337157K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202617x their median

    This is just ridiculous man, I need to get the fuck out of the trenches https://t.co/Uik29S6zpu

    1.4K1940824200K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202616x their median

    People reactivating their CT accounts again. https://t.co/HFVOnz6i18

    1.4K11316724250K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202613x their median

    WARNING: this post is about Callout Rewards and will make you feel incredibly sidelined. @PoorGoat_ made $60,000 today @Cupseyy made $26,000 today @trading_axe made $22,000 today if you have a phone and an internet connection, you are leaving free money on the table.

    8774038578250K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 105 interactions against 710K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.691% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 113K interactions, about 1080x its own typical post.

What is smolting (@wassie)'s engagement rate on X?
smolting (@wassie) (@inversebrah) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 710,415 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, smolting (@wassie) sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @inversebrah have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @inversebrah post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going