Back to @interrec's profile

Emerald van Zyl engagement report

@interrec - 89K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.011%
of 89K followers
Per impression
0.347%
2.7K views on a typical post
Reach
3.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
10
interactions (median)
Saved
0.073%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 4,199 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 0.347% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 327x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Emerald van Zyl's engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,199 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, Emerald van Zyl sits above the 10th percentile of the 40,619 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.013%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.082%
p750.443%
p902.07%
p99145.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 40,619 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 91,008 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.082%
75th percentile0.443%
90th percentile2.07%
99th percentile145.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%56K
01:00 UTC-2%57K
02:00 UTC-3%56K
03:00 UTC-4%59K
04:00 UTC-6%48K
05:00 UTC-4%47K
06:00 UTC-4%54K
07:00 UTC-4%58K
08:00 UTC-4%68K
09:00 UTC-4%78K
10:00 UTC-3%81K
11:00 UTC-3%88K
12:00 UTC-2%97K
13:00 UTC-2%106K
14:00 UTC-3%109K
15:00 UTC-2%112K
16:00 UTC-3%109K
17:00 UTC-3%102K
18:00 UTC-2%95K
19:00 UTC-2%89K
20:00 UTC-1%83K
21:00 UTC-1%74K
22:00 UTC-1%64K
23:00 UTC-1%57K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%250K
Monday+1%320K
Tuesday-3%340K
Wednesday-4%295K
Thursday-2%259K
Friday-3%271K
Saturday+3%244K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 2026327x their median

    All vehicle owners. Kindly note that 90 % of all vehicle loan accounts are overcharged between R 3 000 & R 52 000 as interest on loan accounts are illegally calculated in advance. The Ombud Scheme is presently adjudicating Wesbank. For more information phone me at 082 2911133

    2.3K884211276K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202623x their median

    All vehicle owners. Kindly note that 90 % of all vehicle loan accounts are overcharged between R 3 000 & R 52 000 as interest on loan accounts are illegally calculated in advance. The Ombud Scheme is presently adjudicating Wesbank. For more information phone me at 082 29111333

    15873214.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202613x their median

    Finally the CHICKEN CAME HOME TO ROOST. Wesbank basically admitted that their interest methodology of interest in advance is illegal. On my report the bank reduced the clients loan agreement with R 50 000 to leave only the balloon payment of R 80 000 to pay.

    9434102.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20269.7x their median

    Wesbank is being investigated by the National Financial Ombud Scheme using the illegal interest methodogy of interest in advance that caused that clint was overcharged with R 52 400. Letter was handed to NFO in which Reserve Bank informed banks that this method was illegal.

    6431202.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20268.8x their median

    All vehicle owners. Kindly note that 90 % of all vehicle loan accounts are overcharged between R 3 000 & R 52 000 as interest on loan accounts are illegally calculated in advance. The Ombud Scheme is presently adjudicating Wesbank. For more information phone me at 082 2911133

    6523003.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.8x their median

    Wesbank is being investigated by the National Financial Ombud Scheme using the illegal interest methodogy of interest in advance that caused that clint was overcharged with R 52 400. Letter was handed to NFO in which Reserve Bank informed banks that this method was illegal.

    3718302.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.9x their median

    After years of dispute the National Financial Ombud Scheme finally conceeded that I am correct and last week demanded STANDARD BANK to refund clients R 167 000 & R89 000 - Many claims to follow. If you want your account investigated plse phone me at 082 2911333 to disccuss

    3612102.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.1x their median

    Read how STANDARD BANK overcharged client after the bank suffered a lost of R 1 b in 2008 and now been informed by the National Ombud Scheme to refund plse visit the website https://t.co/52MC4hg42M and read the post "STANDARD BANK- THE ROAD OF DESTRUCTION OF MORTGAGE CLIENTS"

    2911102.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.7x their median

    Two Standard Bank clients last week received refunds of respectively R 167 000 & R 89 000 (proof available on request) after SB was informed by National Ombud Scheme to refund clients due to the illegal increase of interest rates in 2009 after the bank suffered loses of R1b

    2214012.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.2x their median

    Two Standard Bank clients last week received refunds of respectively R 167 000 & R 89 000 (proof available on request) after SB was informed by National Ombud Scheme to refund clients due to the illegal increase of interest rates in 2009 after the bank suffered loses of R1b

    248002.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 4,199 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 0.347% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 327x its own typical post.

What is Emerald van Zyl's engagement rate on X?
Emerald van Zyl (@interrec) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 89,433 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, Emerald van Zyl sits above the 10th percentile of the 40,619 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @interrec have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,199 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @interrec post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going