Back to @insideclimate's profile

Inside Climate News engagement report

@insideclimate - 226K followers on X

Measured over 73 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 226K followers
Per impression
0.262%
1.9K views on a typical post
Reach
0.85%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.43/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 226K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 73 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.9K times each, and 0.262% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.847% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 73 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 278 interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

Measured over 73 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Inside Climate News's engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Inside Climate News sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 204 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 202656x their median

    A handful of mega -data center projects would emit over 100 million tons per year of greenhouse gases, an enormous amount roughly equal to the annual emissions of a mid-sized industrialized country. https://t.co/1gGAluxudh

    13610726913K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202615x their median

    Scientists worry krill fishing in Antarctica may negatively impact growing whale populations. https://t.co/0MmOluCZie

    3928432.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202614x their median

    Earth is in the “climate overshoot” zone, according to a new UN report, and “we aren’t prepared for what’s coming,” one of the authors says. https://t.co/V44NLZvBvm

    4029203.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20266.6x their median

    A Florida sheriff’s office found no evidence of criminal neglect or abuse in the case of a business where more than 50 wild sloths died. A law professor says, “Our legal system is incredibly flawed when it comes to the treatment of sentient animals.” https://t.co/tQMtTrSXve

    1911213.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20265.2x their median

    In Indonesia's Spermonde Archipelago, researchers used an underwater acoustic recorder to detect the booms of destructive bomb fishing. They discovered explosives were dropped on the coral reef hot spot once every 62 minutes. https://t.co/x9ePKyFhUs

    169103.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20265.0x their median

    As a record-breaking El Niño continues to grow in the Eastern Pacific, climate scientist Daniel Swain explains it’s shaping up to be “monstrous” and is “so far above anything we’ve previously seen, it doesn’t even fit on the same axis.” https://t.co/U3ANCFUsjo

    1310022.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20265.0x their median

    A Trump administration rule eviscerating habitat protections for endangered species just went into effect. States are fighting back. https://t.co/37LzF1RQ7n

    196002.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.0x their median

    More than 1,200 of the 15,000 chemicals added to food packaging materials cause cancer or other serious health harms, new research shows. But most have no publicly available information to assess risks. https://t.co/nH3tr9ilyM

    177012.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.8x their median

    California is quickly moving away from natural gas as a fuel for power plants. Here’s how and why: https://t.co/YBptnodHnu

    146312.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.6x their median

    Texas agencies want to know how much water data centers are using. Operators aren’t responding and regulators have sent the surveys to the wrong addresses. https://t.co/OyVYHHvFud

    1310002.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 226K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 73 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.9K times each, and 0.262% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.847% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 73 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 278 interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

What is Inside Climate News's engagement rate on X?
Inside Climate News (@insideclimate) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 73 original posts from the last 30 days against 225,531 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Inside Climate News sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @insideclimate have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @insideclimate post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going