Injective 🥷 engagement report
@injective - 537K followers on X
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 586 interactions against 537K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 2.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Injective 🥷's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.109%, Injective 🥷 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 78% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 25% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 409 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 12, 20263.2x their median
$INJ is coming to Wall Street 🏛️ That's it. That's the tweet. https://t.co/Ioo5cQQLhT
- Oct 12, 20262.4x their median
Just heard from the dev team. Quantum-resistant infrastructure is coming to $INJ Development is officially in progress ⏳️
- Sep 3, 20262.1x their median
The time has come...Trade $CASHCAT, meme stocks or any @RobinhoodCrypto token with $INJ and native $USDC on @Jumperapp. All swapping and bridging is done behind the scenes with the lowest fees and fastest speeds. The memes of production start here 🥷 https://t.co/uFkqOIZ0Cb
- Aug 30, 20262.1x their median
$INJ is now on @RobinhoodApp Robinhood tokens are now on $INJ More soon ⏳⏳ https://t.co/fLV9s4Iw09
- Aug 28, 20262.0x their median
Injective is now officially integrated with @lifiprotocol and @jumperapp, enabling a host of new bridge routes to injective-protocol:native Onboard from Base, BNB Chain, Robinhood Chain and more in one click. The entire onchain economy will be connected to Injective. Slowly, then all at once.
- Sep 10, 20262.0x their median
Injective USDC officially becomes the canonical standard across the entire Cosmos ecosystem and dYdX. Together with @circle, @cosmoshub, and @dydx we’re bringing USDC.inj to chains and apps across Cosmos, with migration via Skip:Go starting tomorrow. https://t.co/7sABYNNEb3
- Sep 3, 20261.9x their median
Today, over $1 Billion in real estate mortgages have been tokenized on Injective. This also makes Injective one of the largest layer-1 chains by total RWA asset value and marks the beginning as Pineapple Financial tokenizes its $10 Billion portfolio on injective-protocol:native https://t.co/Z6fmwQsOhJ
- Sep 1, 20261.9x their median
OFFICIAL STATEMENT FROM INJECTIVE Yesterday, Injective contributors coordinated an accelerated network upgrade that took longer than initially expected to complete across all validators and ecosystem infrastructure. The Injective blockchain and INJ remained secure throughout the process. The underlying protocol and consensus were not compromised, user and staked funds remain safe, and the chain continued processing transactions. Given the accelerated nature of the upgrade, some validators were temporarily jailed after being unable to upgrade within the required window, resulting in a temporary decline in displayed network stake. Some exchanges also temporarily disabled deposits and withdrawals while updating their nodes. No staked injective-protocol:native were lost or at risk, and we are working directly with validators and exchanges as they complete the upgrade process. The accelerated upgrade followed an exploit affecting a small number of ecosystem applications operating binary options markets. The incident was isolated to those applications and did not exploit the Injective blockchain, protocol, native assets or consensus. The relevant attack vector has since been contained and patched. Reports characterizing this as an exploit or halt of the Injective blockchain are inaccurate. The chain was upgraded, not halted, and the underlying network remained secure throughout. We are now implementing enhanced invariants, real-time monitoring systems and additional safeguards designed to identify anomalous activity earlier and help prevent similar incidents. As attack techniques become increasingly sophisticated, including through advances in AI, Injective will work closely with ecosystem developers to continually raise security standards across the network. Injective continues to operate at scale, processing billions of transactions, onboarding thousands of new onchain users and supporting billions of dollars in tokenized asset activity. That positive trajectory will only accelerate moving forward. Injective is secure, fully operational and more resilient than ever. We will continue raising the bar for security across both the protocol and the broader ecosystem. The best days for Injective are ahead. Onwards and upwards.
- Oct 11, 20261.9x their median
The new Injective Whitepaper is officially live along with one of the largest enterprise partnerships to date. It’s our first full rewrite since the original paper in December 2018, and it lays out how every layer of Injective accelerates tokenization and gives them utility across markets, applications, and AI agents. Below are the top developments from across Injective this past week ⤵️ 🟪 The new Injective Whitepaper details native RWA tokenization with role-based permissions over mint, send, receive, and burn, plus iAssets that track external assets with oracle pricing. 🟪 Gulf Labs, part of Thailand’s $27 billion GULF Group, selected Injective for its institutional validator and will work with us across tokenization, stablecoins, and enterprise distribution. 🟪 @CanaryFunds confirmed the Canary Staked INJ ETF is coming soon under the ticker INJC. 🟪 Injective's Trench Treasury is live, and its first $INJ rewards went to the @sproutsomefun and @runupdotfun communities for bringing new users into the $INJ trenches. 🟪 10% of the @NinjaCatSF supply now sits in the Injective Trench Treasury, backing a Solana project that lets users earn $INJ directly with revenue. 🟪 Builders and users can now explore 270+ apps, projects, and partners integrated with Injective on the new Injective Ecosystem Page. 🟪 New CCTP routes let you move native @USDC to Injective from any EVM chain or Solana. 🟪 Injective Stockdrop rewards went sent out, allowing users to earn tokenized stocks from Nvidia to GameStop for burning $INJ 📊 Key Stats 🟪 Over $1 billion in RWAs is now tokenized on Injective, making it one of the largest chains by total RWA value. 🟪 @HelixMarkets posted $832 million in 7D volume and $83.4 billion in cumulative volume in its latest weekly review. 🌐 Ecosystem News 🟪 Injective took over Token 2049 with one of the largest events co-hosted with @Microsoft and visibility across every Grab ride which included Injective branding 🟪 $INJ is now live for trading on X across @coinbase, @krakenfx, @Gemini and @webullGlobal. 🟪 @CoinMarketCap published a full report on Injective’s onchain finance stack, from perps to RWAs and beyond. 🟪 Injective CEO @ericinjective was interviewed by the Block where he laid out Injective’s path to securing U.S. ETFs for $INJ in the coming months 🟪 Injective COO @mirza was interviewed by the Charles Schwab network on the growing dominance of tokenization and institutional adoption 🟪 Injective officially noted its ongoing work to integrate groundbreaking privacy and quantum-resistance to the network A new whitepaper, new USDC rails, new institutional partners in one week and major upcoming infrastructure upgrades across privacy & quantum-resistance. We're just getting started.
- Oct 8, 20261.8x their median
The Injective Trench Treasury has acquired 10% of the @NinjaCatSF supply. NinjaCat launched on Solana via @LaunchOnSF with liquidity on @Raydium and lets users earn $INJ directly with revenue. The team has opened a new path for a legion of Solana users to discover INJ and has quietly built one of the most dedicated communities for Injective in the $SOL trenches. This is a further signal for what what the Injective Trench Treasury was built for. Projects that bring real user discovery for Injective with organic growth and unique value accrual mechanisms for INJ will be prioritized. To builders, put INJ at the core of what you ship with real innovation and the Trench Treasury will be here for you. To the NinjaCat community, welcome to the ninja family.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 586 interactions against 537K followers, an engagement rate of 0.109%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 2.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.
- What is Injective 🥷's engagement rate on X?
- Injective 🥷 (@injective) has an engagement rate of 0.109%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 536,962 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.109%, Injective 🥷 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @injective have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @injective post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.