Back to @inimigo's profile

Inimigo Público engagement report

@inimigo - 382K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 382K followers
Per impression
2.10%
4.5K views on a typical post
Reach
1.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
94
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 382K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.5K times each, and 2.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 90% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Inimigo Público's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Inimigo Público sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,567 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 187 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202611x their median

    O novo Movimento de Mulheres Conservadoras tem um problema: não pediram autorização aos respetivos maridos para se meterem na política, atrasaram-se a fazer o jantar, as camisas por engomar acumulam-se. https://t.co/DDzJSPA08z

    880131231620K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20269.3x their median

    Hollywood está constantemente a ser acusada de promover as carreiras de “nepo babies”, como Maya Hawke (filha de Ethan Hawke), Margaret Qualley (filha de Andie MacDowell) ou o Pantufa, o podengo português que interpreta Argus no blockbuster “A Odisseia”. https://t.co/GlY2uM5CF1

    810554828K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.2x their median

    Hilariante!!’ 😂🤣 https://t.co/mjVobIbekU

    65360431754K viewsView on X
  • Feb 18, 20264.7x their median

    José Luís Carneiro vai tornar-se comentador desportivo na SportTV para Luís Montenegro prestar-lhe atenção https://t.co/uM5mjIvX3y

    3982910913K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.7x their median

    Talentos de outro mundo! https://t.co/9cWGGBDPts

    324149114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.8x their median

    Um português que passa os dias a vasculhar e despejar no chão contentores do lixo em Lisboa conseguiu reciclar 10 milhões de garrafas de plástico e receber vouchers no valor de um milhão de euros. Será apresentado como “case study” na próxima Web Summit. https://t.co/lRjIrLs0x4

    2371010414K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.7x their median

    Além do carro da Judiciária, Neves tem um C130 da Força Aérea para ir comprar parafusos ao hiper Império do Meio, um comboio intercidades da CP para chegar ao monte de São Teotónio e um cavalo da GNR que o leva à praia. https://t.co/4GuqMPAQHi

    223191159.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20261.7x their median

    Seguro pede "grande consenso" entre Jesus e Ronaldo. https://t.co/1pfg4T0dK2

    13615723.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    Nuno Melo adjudicou a compra de três foguetões à Itália, quatro balões de ar quente Zeppelin à Alemanha e uma passarola ao padre Bartolomeu de Gusmão. https://t.co/DxLE2SBnh4

    10712644.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Medidas drásticas tiveram de ser tomadas. https://t.co/S2bub6roz6

    1159214.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 382K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.5K times each, and 2.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 90% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Inimigo Público's engagement rate on X?
Inimigo Público (@inimigo) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 382,490 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Inimigo Público sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @inimigo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @inimigo post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going