Back to @infodexx's profile

Infodex engagement report

@infodexx - 292K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.029%
of 292K followers
Per impression
0.421%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
6.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
70
interactions (median)
Saved
0.085%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.6/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.421% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.9K interactions, about 113x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Infodex's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, Infodex sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 680 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 3, 2026113x their median

    ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico City Was Once a City of Lakes. https://t.co/4LUcouOKT5

    7.4K4624633471K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202663x their median

    Cultural map of Europe: one famous work of art for each country. https://t.co/zaDLEYSN01

    4.0K2927949227K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202655x their median

    The longest-running cartoon set in each U.S. state. https://t.co/nFt7QA5KqW

    3.4K18414356646K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202628x their median

    9/11 victims by state of residence ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ. https://t.co/2cOWazDgxl

    1.9K33237662K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202619x their median

    Top 50 Best Rock Bands of All Time : 1. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง The Beatles 2. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง The Rolling Stones 3. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Led Zeppelin 4. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Pink Floyd 5. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Queen 6. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Fleetwood Mac 7. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช U2 8. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Sly & the Family Stone 9. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Black Sabbath 10. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Nirvana 11. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง The Who 12. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Metallica 13. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ AC/DC 14. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Creedence Clearwater Revival 15. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Talking Heads 16. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ The Grateful Dead 17. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Heart 18. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง The Clash 19. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ The Beach Boys 20. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Radiohead 21. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Van Halen 22. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Rage Against the Machine 23. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Guns N' Roses 24. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ The Velvet Underground 25. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Manรก 26. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Pretenders 27. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Parliament/Funkadelic 28. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ The Allman Brothers Band 29. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ R.E.M. 30. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Pearl Jam 31. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Paramore 32. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Aerosmith 33. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ The White Stripes 34. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Nine Inch Nails 35. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Eagles 36. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Ramones 37. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Thin Lizzy 38. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Santana 39. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Green Day 40. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Blondie 41. ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ The Band 42. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Earth, Wind & Fire 43. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ No Doubt 44. ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Cafรฉ Tacvba 45. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ The Stooges 46. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Oasis 47. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Def Leppard 48. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Sleater-Kinney 49. ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง The Cure 50. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Red Hot Chili Peppers Source: - Billboard, โ€œThe 50 Best Rock Bands (Full List): Staff Picks,โ€ November 19, 2025 Note: Ranked by Billboard writers on legacy, influence, and enduring relevance, limited to bands rather than solo artists or vocal groups. Flags mark primary origin; Fleetwood Mac and The Band had mixed UK/US and Canada/US lineups. This is one outletโ€™s staff list, not a combined Rolling Stoneโ€“NMEโ€“Billboard ranking.

    9048432053199K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202618x their median

    Language map of Europe โ€” by the languages actually spoken, not by national borders. https://t.co/UiPLHJ2ka8

    1.1K5913111442K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20265.3x their median

    Japanese Stereotype Map of the World from 1932. https://t.co/ouVDE0ISiZ

    334285366K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20264.9x their median

    How Much Wealth Does the Top 1% Own? ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Russia โ€” 56% ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท Turkey โ€” 40% ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Czechia โ€” 38% ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ช Sweden โ€” 36% ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary โ€” 33% ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany โ€” 30% ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท France โ€” 27% ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Norway โ€” 26% ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Denmark โ€” 25% ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Switzerland โ€” 25% ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ Poland โ€” 25% ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Ukraine โ€” 25% ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain โ€” 24% ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United Kingdom โ€” 23% ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy โ€” 22% ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria โ€” 22% ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช Ireland โ€” 22% ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Finland โ€” 21% ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portugal โ€” 21% ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ท Greece โ€” 20% ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ด Romania โ€” 20% ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฌ Bulgaria โ€” 20% ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡ธ Serbia โ€” 20% ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ท Croatia โ€” 19% ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡น Lithuania โ€” 19% ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡พ Cyprus โ€” 19% ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ป Latvia โ€” 18% ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ช Estonia โ€” 18% ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ Iceland โ€” 18% ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ Luxembourg โ€” 18% ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ Slovenia โ€” 17% ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฐ N. Macedonia โ€” 17% ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Albania โ€” 17% ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ฆ Bosnia โ€” 17% ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ช Montenegro โ€” 17% ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฉ Moldova โ€” 17% ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡พ Belarus โ€” 17% ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡น Malta โ€” 16% ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands โ€” 16% ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium โ€” 14% ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Slovakia โ€” 14% Europe average: the richest 1% own ~25% of all household wealth..The poorest 50% own ~3%. Note: This is share of national wealth, not โ€œhow rich you must be to enter the 1%.โ€ Housing and pensions change the ranking. Some Eastern/Balkan figures are estimates. Sources: World Inequality Database, UBS Global Wealth Report

    2774988127K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20263.5x their median

    Jewish population by U.S. county. https://t.co/UZB40ILfoL

    2191212352K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.5x their median

    Italy in 1796. https://t.co/79WwGt1kEq

    149242117K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.421% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.9K interactions, about 113x its own typical post.

What is Infodex's engagement rate on X?
Infodex (@infodexx) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 292,441 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, Infodex sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @infodexx have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @infodexx post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going