Back to @imwsl90's profile

卫斯理 engagement report

@imwsl90 - 100K followers on X

Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.019%
of 100K followers
Per impression
0.498%
3.7K views on a typical post
Reach
3.80%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0.054%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.33/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.498% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.3K interactions, about 352x its own typical post.

Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

卫斯理's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, 卫斯理 sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,862 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,862 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video46% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 2026352x their median

    👏 https://t.co/p3NW3PcWBo

    4.8K1.1K4033588K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202672x their median

    I find it very soothing to boot my computer, and the first thing I see is Ken Thompson's face staring at me with warmth and wisdom. To the giants 🥂 https://t.co/X1YIO415sT https://t.co/iwG7dHdYlk

    1.2K4147847K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202655x their median

    腾讯早年有个鲜为人知的困境:马化腾性格偏内向,又长着一张娃娃脸,出去跟人谈合作,对方一看这年轻人,总觉得不太靠谱,话里话外带着轻视。谈判桌上屡屡受挫,业务迟迟打不开局面,最艰难的时候,他甚至动过把腾讯卖掉的念头。 转机出现在曾李青的加入。 曾李青是个典型的 "江湖老手",之前在深圳电信局工作,性格外向,能说会道,三教九流都能聊到一块儿去。他最经典的战绩,是当年凭一张嘴说服了地产商,建成了中国第一个通宽带的住宅小区 —— 这在当时可不是件容易的事。 马化腾把他请来,说白了就是让他 "压台面"。 曾李青到了腾讯之后,主抓销售。很快就帮公司拿下了第一笔电子邮箱的业务,合同金额五十万,这在当时是一笔不小的收入。更关键的是,在腾讯最缺钱、快要撑不下去的时候,是曾李青四处奔走,拉来了 IDG 的两百万美元投资。这笔钱,相当于给腾讯续了命。 一个技术天才,一个销售悍将;一个内敛深耕,一个外向冲锋。两个人凑到一起,恰好补上了彼此的短板。 其实创业也好,做事也罢,没有谁是全能的。每个人都有自己的长处和短处,关键不在于把自己磨成一个面面俱到的人,而在于把自己最擅长的事做到极致,然后找到能补上你短板的人,组成一支队伍。 你擅长技术,就去找懂销售的;你擅长战略,就去找能落地执行的。团队成员之间,性格可以不同,能力可以有差异,但只要互相包容、凹凸互补,就能把每个人的优势叠加起来,最终彼此成就。 马化腾和曾李青的故事,说到底就是一句话:一个人走得快,一群人走得远。找到对的搭档,比逼自己成为全能选手重要得多。

    705632146487K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202633x their median

    Discovery For open-ended research questions, Atria Dawn Preview breaks down research goals, searches and evaluates sources, compares perspectives, and traces key evidence across sources. It turns scattered information into structured, citable, and verifiable research findings—helping researchers move beyond finding information toward building evidence and forming research judgments. 🎥 See Atria Dawn Preview in action.

    4917121269K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202613x their median

    今天想明白了 失业人士最应该做的四件事情 1、早睡 2、减肥 3、提升英文水平 4、做内容

    1991818013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202613x their median

    每个自媒体人都应该去做一套dashboard 把自己的工作工具化、流程化、系统化 https://t.co/OdD9Qzhs4s

    1811032426K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202612x their median

    https://t.co/O14zeuZBYq

    17824607.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20269.2x their median

    日本乐天卡 esim上线 🎉🎉🎉 - 接收海外网站验证码,已验证网站 - X,ChatGPT, Whatsapp, Telegram, Google, Signal, Discord - 每月1G高速直连上网,东京原生IP出口 注意这个卡无法接打电话和发短信,可以收短信 了解详情: https://t.co/APZJJLCStH https://t.co/OeIuJzfbij

    148160173K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.3x their median

    睡觉了 Omarchy真是一件艺术品... Linux社区折腾了无数个版本,无数中桌面解决方案,怎么没人搞出来? 反而从没有玩Linux桌面的 @dhh 搞出来了? 为什么? 也许真的是taste的问题 https://t.co/8dmNX4f1ju

    112827228K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20268.1x their median

    中港澳esim手机卡 - 海外esim手机,直接扫码激活使用 - 国内esim手机,港澳激活,内地可用,也可写小白卡用 HK/SG双IP出口,最低只要19元 了解详情:https://t.co/npzKkni3N1 https://t.co/ConMrVDnI5

    126190198K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 0.498% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.3K interactions, about 352x its own typical post.

What is 卫斯理's engagement rate on X?
卫斯理 (@imwsl90) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 100 original posts from the last 30 days against 99,518 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, 卫斯理 sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,862 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @imwsl90 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @imwsl90 post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going