Back to @imtransito's profile

Montevideo Tránsito engagement report

@imtransito - 78K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.005%
of 78K followers
Per impression
0.319%
1.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0.319% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51 interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Montevideo Tránsito's engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, Montevideo Tránsito sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 150 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 202613x their median

    Comenzaron las obras de saneamiento en Av. 8 de Octubre 👷 Los trabajos sustituirán los tramos de la red que están más críticos con la tecnología #Liner en el tramo comprendido entre Alférez Real y José de Béjar 🚧 Todos los detalles 👇 https://t.co/yNhLzJ8eKw

    3314133.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.3x their median

    ⏩ Avanza la obra de corrección del peralte y repavimentación en rambla de Punta Gorda 📍 Rambla República de México entre Araucana y 6 de Abril https://t.co/4aISDmxtZo

    156403.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.8x their median

    📍 Bv. Gral. Artigas y Av. Agraciada. ❌ Intersección obstruida. Extremar la precaución al circular. https://t.co/IxR9hSYLW4

    62212.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.3x their median

    📍Rbla. O Higgins y Mississipi. ❌Cortada la circulación al centro. Personal del @Minterioruy y de Bomberos se encuentran en el lugar. 🚗El tránsito desvía por Mississipi. https://t.co/Euv0Icg1GK

    53011.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.0x their median

    📍 Bv. Gral. Artigas y Av. Agraciada. ⚠️ Extremar precaución al circular. https://t.co/Pq88sjgyyb

    430111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.8x their median

    📍Bv. Batlle y Ordóñez y Av. José Pedro Varela. ❌ Un carril obstruido al sur. https://t.co/pj8zpS7UsH

    51013.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.8x their median

    📍 Bv. Gral. Artigas y Av. Joaquín Suárez. ❌ Un carril obstruido al oeste. Extremar la precaución al circular. https://t.co/Fjq5jM7Ul0

    42013.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20261.5x their median

    🚦Ferrer Serra y Acevedo Diaz 🚦Ferrer Serra y Cassinoni Extremar precaución al circular. https://t.co/X7Zlp65VhJ

    32011.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20261.5x their median

    📍 Av. San Martín e Isidoro de María ✖️ Carril obstruido hacia el norte. https://t.co/3dHA8TaGcu

    2310981 viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.5x their median

    🚦Cno. Carrasco y Zum Felde. 🔌Por hurto de líneas. ⚠️Extremar la precaución al circular. https://t.co/EXMlSXOORw

    32011.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 78K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0.319% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 51 interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is Montevideo Tránsito's engagement rate on X?
Montevideo Tránsito (@imtransito) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 78,031 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, Montevideo Tránsito sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @imtransito have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @imtransito post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going