Impressions engagement report
@impression_ists - 196K followers on X
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 766 interactions against 196K followers, an engagement rate of 0.392%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 4.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Impressions's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.392%, Impressions sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,175 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.672%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.672% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 397 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 6, 202611x their median
In 1908, Edvard Munch spent eight months in a psychiatric clinic in Copenhagen. He couldn't sleep. He heard voices. He'd spent two decades painting anguish — the scream on the bridge, the sickroom, the death. Three years later, he painted this — a sunrise so wide it barely fits inside its own frame. He'd just left Dr. Jacobson's clinic when he entered the competition to decorate the University of Oslo's ceremonial hall. The commission: paint enlightenment itself, for a room built to mark a hundred years of the university. He painted The Sun. He chose a sunrise over the skerries near Kragerø, where he used to work outdoors. Not symbolic light — actual light, on a canvas nearly eight meters wide. "I saw the sun rise above the cliffs — I painted the sun," is all he ever said about it. Look at it next to The Scream sometime. Same hand. Thirty years apart.
- Aug 28, 20266.8x their median
Van Gogh vs. Gauguin They spent 9 weeks together. They painted side by side. Same scenes. Completely different result. Here are some of their best “duels" 🧵 1. Night Café, Arles
- Sep 20, 20266.3x their median
Look at the circular ripples on the water. Now look at the date: 1875. This isn't just a landscape—it's Gustave Caillebotte’s L’Yerres, effet de pluie. Rain is a nightmare to paint. Most Impressionists avoided it. Caillebotte tilted the angle down and used his background in engineering to map the exact physics of a raindrop hitting the river. While Monet dissolved reality into light, Caillebotte gave it structure. Yet history wrote him off as a rich benefactor who paid his friends' rent. He funded the Impressionist movement, but critics dismissed his own technical genius as too rigid. In reality, he was years ahead of them.
- Sep 3, 20266.0x their median
Yellow Van Gogh "I want to paint with the most intense yellow there is." Vincent confessed to his brother that he used yellow as an antidepressant. Fighting sadness with color. Yellow was energy and life. https://t.co/kqLzdGktsy
- Aug 27, 20263.9x their median
1871: Renoir was placed before a firing squad. He was going to die. For treason. Why? He was just 30 years old. It was during the Paris Commune in 1871. Renoir was painting along the Seine, but the National Guard wasn't in the mood for art. They accused him of mapping out the river's fortifications. A crowd gathered, shouting, "Drown the traitor in the river!" They dragged him to the town hall to be executed. Luckily, he had friends: an acquaintance at the town hall spotted him, embraced him, and convinced the soldiers he was just an artist. Saved right before the firing squad could end his life.
- Sep 5, 20263.5x their median
Turner 1830 Monet 1872 In 1870, Monet arrives in London and discovers Turner. The impact is immediate. Light and atmosphere. A precursor to Impressionism? https://t.co/y1SgchHM01
- Oct 4, 20263.4x their median
Hopper made loneliness visible. But how do you make a painting feel lonely when nobody looks sad? He thought through every detail in Nighthawks. ▪️ Nobody talks. ▪️ The street is empty. ▪️ There’s no visible door to the diner. ▪️ Nobody seems to care about anyone else. Everyone is close together. Yet somehow, everyone is alone. That’s exactly why it feels so lonely.
- Sep 5, 20263.3x their median
Toulouse-Lautrec painting one of his Masterpieces https://t.co/RlkK9Yyhrm
- Sep 21, 20263.2x their median
Monet vs Renoir La Grenouillère In 1869, two broke friends stood side by side and painted the same scene. Renoir watched the people. Monet watched the water. One cared about life on the riverbank. The other cared about what the light was doing to the river. Same day. Same view. Two ways of seeing the world. Which one?
- Sep 21, 20263.1x their median
One of the most underrated Impressionists? Korovin's Paris night scenes capture light like French masters, with a distinct Russian sensibility. He lacked fame during his lifetime, but today he is widely celebrated as a master of Russian Impressionism. https://t.co/uB6c4g3hzm
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 766 interactions against 196K followers, an engagement rate of 0.392%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 4.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
- What is Impressions's engagement rate on X?
- Impressions (@impression_ists) has an engagement rate of 0.392%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 195,712 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.392%, Impressions sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,175 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @impression_ists have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @impression_ists post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.