Back to @immad's profile

immad engagement report

@immad - 831K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.058%
of 831K followers
Per impression
0.633%
76K views on a typical post
Reach
9.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
481
interactions (median)
Saved
0.105%
80 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 481 interactions against 831K followers, an engagement rate of 0.058%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 76K times each, and 0.633% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 20% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 41x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

immad's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.058%, immad sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 5, 202641x their median

    What just happened? The S&P 500 just erased nearly -$2 TRILLION of market cap just hours after 3rd strongest US jobs report in 18 months. Meanwhile, Bitcoin is officially down over -50% from its record high in October 2025. What's happening? Let us explain. (a thread) https://t.co/8T3ViBo3U6

    16K2.2K7254645.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.0x their median

    In love with this new @mercury card https://t.co/mnEKgBFHb5

    4.1K8045652.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20268.9x their median

    Launching @vorfluxai : The autopilot for software engineering. I was prev co-founder / CTO of @Rippling ($10B) and #1 coder in India. Vorflux is my high octane Ferrari. Every AI coding tool still makes you fly the plane. That's the copilot model: you stay in the seat, approving every turn. The models quietly got good enough to fly the whole route, but the tools never caught up. So we built the autopilot. @vorfluxai raised a $15M seed by @ycombinator @peakxvpartners @alliancedao @parkerconrad @jake_zeller @balajis @nivi @metakovan @lmrankhan @nikitabase @0xrwu @ayushjaiswal @mattshumer_ @eshamanideep @sreeramkannan @dvcoolster @nusimow @TeddySolomon11 @ashtoncofer @rvivek etc Drop your biggest engineering bottleneck below. I'll reply with how I'd attack it with Vorflux, and hand you $200 in free credits to bang out your backlog. Our full thesis 🧵👇

    3.2K2436341842.2M viewsView on X
  • Mar 30, 20213.9x their median

    Over the years, I have tried to share learnings from my startups and seed investing. Decided to combine my startup tweets+tweetstorms into a tweethurricane. Here are my learnings + advice, from pitching investors to getting through the journey:

    1.5K22511927View on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.7x their median

    the more people you consult for advice, the more likely you’ll make a bad/average decision. (1) ppl are, on average, risk averse...and, in quantity, will blunt your boldness. (2) ppl may hate/envy opportunities they lack. (3) ppl tend to mix cynicism (bad) w/ criticism (good)

    1.5K1436250302K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.7x their median

    founders: only send investor updates when you're winning. Listen has sent 3 in its history. All fundraise announcements. Nobody reads a bad update and helps. They just mark you as dying.

    96014172171948K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.6x their median

    1/ Today, we’re launching real-time payments (RTP): instant, always-on money movement, 24/7, weekends and holidays too. Pay someone at 9pm on a Friday, it lands by 9:01. Many banks don’t even know US RTP are possible (lots of banks don’t offer it). Its now live on Mercury. https://t.co/dcHI6lM876

    1.1K385640150K viewsView on X
  • Dec 14, 20243.3x their median

    What are the chances that @elonmusk becomes a trillionaire in the next 10 years? Currently:: 42% of SpaceX $350bn 20% of Tesla $1.37tn Large percentage in X, xAI, Neuralink. Currently he is worth $400bn. Seems almost inevitable.

    1.0K1416014136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.3x their median

    Took the sign to the streets of SF to talk to our customers https://t.co/YASdouzMZ7

    8854512466353K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    I would pay a great deal for a credit card that allowed me to cancel any subscription from their integrated app rather than trying to navigate service websites …

    57812678109K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 481 interactions against 831K followers, an engagement rate of 0.058%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 76K times each, and 0.633% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 20% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 41x its own typical post.

What is immad's engagement rate on X?
immad (@immad) has an engagement rate of 0.058%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 831,018 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.058%, immad sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @immad have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @immad post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

immad (@immad) Engagement Rate - 0.058% | PlayerSells