Back to @iluminatibot's profile

illuminatibot engagement report

@iluminatibot - 2.5M followers on X

Measured over 87 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.067%
of 2.5M followers
Per impression
2.12%
78K views on a typical post
Reach
3.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.114%
89 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.87/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Measured over 87 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 78K times each, and 2.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 87 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 107K interactions, about 65x its own typical post.

Measured over 87 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

illuminatibot's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.067%, illuminatibot sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video24% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 24% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 173 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 202665x their median

    Instead of adding pink ribbons to their products this month maybe companies should just remove the cancer causing ingredients.

    85K21K448431787K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202649x their median

    The aliens are already here! https://t.co/BDrJYPcTkt

    68K8.6K2.7K8324.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202631x their median

    They blew up the twin towers, faked a pandemic, admitted that they eat babies, and everyone is still out here talking about voting our way out of it...

    42K7.7K448256591K viewsView on X
  • Nov 15, 2025

    This video is hard to come by https://t.co/ld06W1FyiA

    20K12K710644560K viewsView on X
  • Jan 5, 2026

    Did you know ROE V. WADE was passed only because ROE lied about being raped? She admitted it on Live TV. Everything you think you know is a lie. https://t.co/PMVpYkclYE

    24K6.5K301211318K viewsView on X
  • Jan 5, 2026

    Obama was a CIA asset put in place to destroy the US. Occidental College records -- SEALED Columbia College records -- SEALED Columbia Thesis paper -- SEALED Harvard College records -- SEALED Selective Service Registration -- SEALED Medical records -- SEALED Illinois State Senate schedule -- SEALED Law practice client list -- SEALED Certified Copy of original Birth certificate -- SEALED Signed Endorsed paper Certification of Live Birth -- SEALED Baptism record -- SEALED Michelle Obama can no longer practice law as an attorney why? Michelle has 22 assistants, when other first Ladies had only one?

    19K9.8K670396241K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202618x their median

    "Give them bread and circuses and they will never revolt" https://t.co/NQtSy25a6i

    25K4.6K261166384K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 2025

    https://t.co/IC9WabAczl

    18K4.4K268170253K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202610x their median

    The missing children in the United States are being trafficked and used for sex, drugs, organ harvesting and black magic rituals by government agencies and elite pedophiles.

    14K3.2K182108219K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 2025

    "The Secret Covenant" https://t.co/GQlQOCqFYN

    11K4.5K236240674K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.067%. Measured over 87 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 78K times each, and 2.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 87 posts sampled, 24% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 107K interactions, about 65x its own typical post.

What is illuminatibot's engagement rate on X?
illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) has an engagement rate of 0.067%, based on the median interactions across 87 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,467,304 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.067%, illuminatibot sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iluminatibot have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iluminatibot post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going