Institutional Investor engagement report
@iimag - 61K followers on X
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 61K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.178% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #artificialintelligence, #alphageneration, #capitalmarkets.
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #artificialintelligence, #alphageneration, #capitalmarkets.
Compared with accounts its own size
Institutional Investor's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 8% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, Institutional Investor sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 8% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 8% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 250 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 14, 20262.5x their median
Greenlight Capital's 1.2% loss in August has reduced its year-to-date return to 5.7%. This decline highlights challenges for institutional investors, particularly in volatile sectors like utilities and finance. https://t.co/olkKQCHnHx
- Sep 25, 20262.0x their median
As oil prices surpass $100 per barrel amid ongoing geopolitical tensions, Conning’s Cindy Beaulieu warns that the Federal Reserve must act to prevent inflation from spreading, a concern for institutional investors monitoring market stability. https://t.co/nsSQCPkFj8
- Sep 16, 20262.0x their median
The world’s 300 largest pension funds grew their assets by 13.4% to a record $27.7 trillion in 2025. As they rethink AI's role, these allocators face increased pressure on governance and investment strategies. https://t.co/IF7jLKOH8M
- Sep 26, 20261.5x their median
Creative Planning's acquisition of RVK, which advises 200 institutional clients with $4.3 trillion, signals a shift as institutional & retail investing converge. This trend raises important questions for asset managers on the future of independent advice. https://t.co/QA44ZOYPLy
- Sep 25, 20261.5x their median
David Kushner, awarded Public Pension CIO of the Year, has built a private markets structure for the City of Austin Employees’ Retirement System. This strategic development prepares the fund for future investment opportunities. https://t.co/T0lRdwzDc6
- Sep 23, 20261.5x their median
Electra Therapeutics is set to sell 21.7 million shares priced between $14 and $16, potentially raising $325 million. This IPO marks a significant opportunity for hedge funds anticipating a resurgence in biopharma offerings. https://t.co/iPBliaddRK
- Sep 22, 20261.5x their median
University endowments that invested early in SpaceX, like the University of Colorado Foundation, report returns exceeding 20%, highlighting a significant performance gap among allocators. This raises questions on future asset allocation strategies. https://t.co/h2dSZL5BNc
- Sep 22, 20261.5x their median
AI Will Help CFM Discover New Sources of Alpha https://t.co/z1789vzJi8 Sponsored by CFM #ArtificialIntelligence #QuantitativeInvesting #AlphaGeneration https://t.co/58jikrvzKd
- Sep 21, 20261.5x their median
Tiger Global Management's $31 million investment in Vecna Robotics underscores the firm's continued commitment to automation in the supply chain. This trend signals significant opportunities for institutional allocators focusing on robotics innovation. https://t.co/Gvf0PNXeYb
- Sep 20, 20261.5x their median
Hedge funds navigated August's volatility, gaining 1.1% as per PivotalPath’s Composite Index. Notably, the Global Macro and Managed Futures indices surged 2.4%, reflecting strategic adaptations to policy interventions. https://t.co/VuifH302MR
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 61K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.178% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #artificialintelligence, #alphageneration, #capitalmarkets.
- What is Institutional Investor's engagement rate on X?
- Institutional Investor (@iimag) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 61,384 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, Institutional Investor sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @iimag have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @iimag post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.