iiTzTimmy engagement report
@iiTzTimmy - 419K followers on X
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 419K followers, an engagement rate of 0.449%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 69K times each, and 2.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 7.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #2ndanniversary, #deltaforce, #dfpartner.
Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #2ndanniversary, #deltaforce, #dfpartner.
Compared with accounts its own size
iiTzTimmy's engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.449%, iiTzTimmy sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 88% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 25% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 74 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 26, 20267.8x their median
Rainbow Six Siege Done ✅ 403:51:08 https://t.co/lJRkiMw9Yv
- Jun 4, 20262.5x their median
Crazy how people actually complain about me playing with pros at the very end of the Apex Pred Marathon when I used to be a Professional + Did that challenge already TWICE and SOLO. (Sorry I didn’t do it solo for the 3rd time! That’s on me!) The whole reason I was doing this marathon was so I could learn/play all 7 games, be good enough to reach the highest rank AND interact with other creators/pros in those gaming communities. Feels like i’m forced to solo queue jail or me reaching the highest rank is invalid. Which is still crazy how I SOLO’D CS2 the entire time and people still say I played with pros and got carried 🤣
- Jan 2, 20265.6x their median
Growing up I had mad insecurities. I honestly hated so many things about myself. Being called skinny all my life had really fucked up my self confidence and having eating problems + a lot of allergies also didn’t help. I couldn’t even wear shorts or tshirts outside because I hated how I looked. In 2021 I weighed 115 pounds when I first went to Red Bull for gym/nutrition advice. They helped me improve my diet and taught me the basics of strength training. I was semi consistent for 4 months but I eventually gave up because I was chronically online from streaming. On October 2024, I decided to lock in. I’ve been consistent for a full year now, starting at 118 pounds and today I weigh 146 pounds. Going to the gym has helped me get out of this dark hole that I’ve been trapped in my entire life. And for once in my life, I can look in the mirror and not say terrible things to myself. While being skinny was my biggest insecurity, I had many more and being a streamer and a professional gamer honestly made my insecurities worse. People in this world say and do the dumbest shit and when you overthink as much as I do, that shit can drive you crazy. In 2021 I had the most insane peak of my career that I couldn’t have ever imagined. It was truly unbelievable and in that time period of my career, I didn’t think I would ever drop or lose the amount of success I’ve gained. I really thought that it was going to last forever. As time passed, my efforts when streaming faded. Being so competitive focused and having self doubts as a person really spiraled my mood into a state of never feeling satisfied. Being a streamer or competitor, the only thing that made me feel anything was ‘success’. Winning or having growth in streaming fueled my happiness. Last year I thought 2025 was going to be the year that I blew up again. I believed that if I popped off, I would be happy again and have no problems. Yet it caused more stress and pressure to myself and while dealing with other life events, I felt like I couldn’t be the best version of myself on stream. I also felt like I couldn’t take a break fully because I was always afraid of losing everything I have built so far while being stuck in this endless rat race of wanting to be more than what I currently am. 2025 has been my worst year statistically since my pop off. My career is the lowest it’s ever been and yet this year has been the happiest I’ve ever been. I’ve been able to regain my self confidence and self worth again by enjoying my life outside of streaming. Really trying to understand myself and what I really even want to do. 2025 was initially going to be the year I go all out in streaming, but it turned out to be the year of mental building and healing. Thank you 2025 for all the unforgettable memories. I also want to say Thank You to my community for always supporting and believing in me. I thought I could mentally be strong and act like nothing was going on, but when I had moments of breaking down, you stayed and supported me. I couldn’t be endlessly grateful for that love and support so Thank you. Thank you so much. I wish everyone a Happy New Years! Thank you once again for following and supporting my journey. 2026 will be the year that I put my all in again. I finally understand how to balance my personal life and streaming life. The passion and drive that I once had when I first started streaming has come again. I’m ready to take on this next chapter of my life and remind the world who the fuck iiTzTimmy is.
- Aug 19, 20265.4x their median
bout fucking time https://t.co/3cGst0KzM6
- Aug 26, 20264.7x their median
https://t.co/7oFeP1PTat
- Sep 23, 20263.7x their median
some things just never change https://t.co/oZWj1fct3i
- Jun 3, 20261.6x their median
Fuck CS2 Premier.
- Aug 26, 20263.5x their median
For the R6 Champ 1 grind these are my thoughts about the game. There are too many issues about the ranked system which in my opinion makes the climb impossible as a solo to C1. My grind was solo queue peak to D4, duo to C5, then 5 stack to C1. Allowing 5 stacks to queue into a solo is stupid. Solo/Duo queue should be its own separate queue like how valorant’s system is. R6 is a super team based and heavy comm game. When I solo queued, I believe 80-90% of my games were completely silent and if someone did speak, it was to complain or talk when it’s the last round and the game was over. Being a solo against a 5 stack is pretty much a loss because a team full of communication + team chemistry will most likely beat a team that isn’t. The rank difference is just shameless. I’m queueing diamond and having a gold/plat on my team. When I queue champ we have a plat on the enemy team. Like how is that even possible. Almost champ 1 and a plat is in my lobby??? These make the overall matches not even feel competitive and become a insta win/loss. The point gain and loss. This also has to be because of the rank imbalance as well. First thing is no win streak bonus. Starting from copper and going all the way up to emerald. I pretty much got a flat 20rr every game. Winning 80% of my games it had no effect on my point gain, which doesn’t incentivize good performance or getting people out of ranks they don’t belong in. In some games where you win too much, they give you extra points per win or skip ranks to get you to verse equal skilled players quicker. Next is how much you win and lose. 20rr is pretty much the base but because the enemy team has one rank higher or lower it can nuke the rr gain. When soloing this hurts a lot. I would play in diamond and have a similar balance of teams but this game I lose 30rr and the next game I win only 13rr. I understand the logic where if a full champ team plays against a diamond team. They should only win 10rr and lose more. I get that but considering how the games ranking system is imbalanced, solos can verse 5 stacks and a 5 stack can have one unranked or super low rank on their team. They can essentially alter the rr gain to where I lose 30 and win only 15. The 10 rank difference needs to be fixed. Lastly is the amount of cheaters and recoil scripters. I got about 100 games rolled back. Which is about 15% of my games. The roll back wave only gave me about 100+ rr because this was when I was pretty much solo queueing my games so it was 50/50 on getting a cheater on my team and enemies. Having rollback is a great feature for a rank system because gaining/losing points you don’t deserve matters. The problem with rollback waves is that someone who generally is emerald rank (despite how many cheaters they verse) gets a 1000+ rr rollback will now be Champ 1. The rollback is good but how much is given at one point affects the quality of players in some ranks. That guy is not Champ 1 skill and should not be there. In an extreme case, a copper player gaining 4900+ rr rollback and is now Champ 1. These are my thoughts about the ranking system and why it’s not fit for solo queue. I played 60-70% of the season as an inexperienced player and I think even an experienced player couldn’t solo to Champ 1 in Rank 3.0. Overall my challenge isn’t meant to be only solo and to be able to connect with people in the community. While I want to try to see if I can reach the highest rank solo and gain the skills/knowledge. I can do that while also playing with others and some games just aren’t designed for it. I personally think I play at a Champ level on some maps (Casino) and Diamond on the others (Lair). Because of the amount of games played on them. R6 is very heavy on map knowledge and if you don’t have the reps on a map, you won’t really know what to do. Also it’s very hard to find people to play with who aren’t already established trusted players. I’m not going to play with random people who could be cheating.
- Jun 9, 2026
The next massive chapter of the Chronoverse is about to unfold! 💥 Join an epic lineup of streamers as they squad up to explore the absolute madness waiting in Season 8.5! Check out the transmission below to spot some of your favorite community faces, and get ready for exclusive first-looks and game-changing sneak peeks. Date: June 10 at 2 PM- 4 PM PT! The countdown has officially begun—are you ready to step into Season 8.5?
- Jul 23, 20262.7x their median
Ruh roh https://t.co/s0kf38GIeW
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 419K followers, an engagement rate of 0.449%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 91% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 69K times each, and 2.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 7.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #2ndanniversary, #deltaforce, #dfpartner.
- What is iiTzTimmy's engagement rate on X?
- iiTzTimmy (@iiTzTimmy) has an engagement rate of 0.449%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 419,134 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.449%, iiTzTimmy sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @iiTzTimmy have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 91% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @iiTzTimmy post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.