Idriss J. Aberkane Ph.D x3 engagement report
@idrissaberkane - 470K followers on X
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 622 interactions against 470K followers, an engagement rate of 0.132%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 91K times each, and 0.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 103K interactions, about 165x its own typical post.
Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #tchernobyl.
Compared with accounts its own size
Idriss J. Aberkane Ph.D x3's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.132%, Idriss J. Aberkane Ph.D x3 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 80% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 60% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 60% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 223 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 28, 2026165x their median
American democracy every four years. https://t.co/wFvvj7WKUx
- Aug 21, 202648x their median
BREAKING: The secret vaccine purchase agreement that South Africa signed with Pfizer has been released. Unknown efficacy Unknown adverse events Unknown long term effects Leaders around the world recklessly turned their citizens into lab-rats by signing this garbage. Insane. https://t.co/M9VKJyJkRU
- Aug 28, 202628x their median
Someone gave a bunch of LLMs the PoliticalCompass questions, and it turns out they're almost all libertarian-leftist in orientation. https://t.co/JProjFmMpE
- Oct 17, 202626x their median
🔴🇫🇷 ARCHIVE Laurent Nunez, le 6 octobre dernier : "Nous n’avons pas perdu le contrôle. Perdre le contrôle, c’est si jamais vous aviez des hordes de personnes qui défilaient dans les centres-villes, qui pillaient les magasins et qui commettaient des exactions." https://t.co/1vR9hxsacA
- Sep 12, 202624x their median
Naomi Wolf nails it: The biggest shocker in the Pfizer docs isn’t the side effects we’ve been aware of, it’s that the vaccine is designed to target human reproduction, not the respiratory system, and they’re obsessed with it, 360 degrees of it, as revealed in a stunning revelation. She explains how the lipid nanoparticles are engineered to penetrate every membrane, including the placenta. This causes calcifications that stop babies from getting nutrients and oxygen. The outcome? Midwives say placentas are falling apart, leading to premature births, horrific maternal hemorrhaging, and a 40% spike in maternal mortality in the West. Pfizer knew the nanoparticles would invade the testes of baby boys in utero, degrading the Leydig cells that produce masculinity and fertility. Even if never vaccinated themselves, they may never develop normally. An andrology report confirmed the vaccine stops sperm motility in men. Most damningly, Pfizer warned male trial participants not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women or to use two forms of contraception, defining “exposure” through semen, skin contact, and breath. Out of 270 pregnancies in the trial, records on 234 were “lost.” But of the remaining 36, more than 80% ended in the loss of the baby. Pfizer knew it. Why was it the main focus of their research? Join my channel, stay updated👇 https://t.co/yELyJuCosi
- Oct 18, 202623x their median
Le mec voulait libérer le détroit d'Ormuz tout seul mais il ne sait même pas protéger un Monoprix. Mais sérieux...🤢
- May 7, 202616x their median
Voici l’enquête qui m’aura coûté le plus cher de toute ma carrière de journaliste citoyen : cartographier les milieux pédocriminels Suisse, contemporains de l’Affaire Epstein et aussi tentaculaires que ceux, plus célèbres, de Belgique Cet article publié dans @france_soir n’est hélas que la partie émergée de l’iceberg et les plus infâmes persécutions auront été dirigées contre moi pour me faire abandonner ce dossier. C’est bien mal me connaître : je n’ai jamais baissé les yeux devant les monstres, et encore moins devant les gangs pédocriminels. Le Premier Devoir de la Charte de Munich est limpide : le journaliste doit donner la vérité au Public quel qu’en soit le risque pour lui-même. Les persécutions sont dès lors un immense honneur 👇 https://t.co/tiOKMdrllm
- Aug 29, 202615x their median
🔴🇫🇷 𝗙𝗟𝗔𝗦𝗛 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗢 — « Nos ennemis, on les tue médiatiquement » : Pierre-Antoine Capton, cofondateur de Mediawan, aurait MENACÉ Guillaume Pley après l’échec des négociations pour le rachat de Legend, selon Valeurs actuelles. « C’est très simple. Soit on rachète Legend, ils deviennent nos amis, on les aide à se développer. Soit on n’y arrive pas, ils deviennent nos ennemis. Et nos ennemis, on les tue médiatiquement », aurait-il déclaré devant Guillaume Pley et ses conseils. Lors des négociations, Mediawan aurait eu accès à des informations confidentielles de Legend : chiffres, audiences, résultats, mais également sa feuille de route éditoriale, comprenant sa stratégie pour la présidentielle de 2027 et le lancement de « Legend Enquête ». Quelques mois après le refus de l’offre, plusieurs enquêtes visant Guillaume Pley ont été publiées, notamment par Le Monde et Les Inrockuptibles, liés à Xavier Niel et Matthieu Pigasse, tous deux cofondateurs de Mediawan avec Pierre-Antoine Capton. L’entourage de Guillaume Pley dit désormais faire le rapprochement avec la phrase attribuée à Pierre-Antoine Capton, tout en reconnaissant ne disposer d’aucune preuve démontrant qu’un ordre aurait été donné aux rédactions. Pierre-Antoine Capton n’a pas répondu aux sollicitations de Valeurs actuelles. (Source : @wdeguerpel)
- Sep 6, 202613x their median
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump unveils new US Space Force uniforms. https://t.co/Ja18ahj1q4
- Nov 10, 20237.6x their median
"[Mon fils est mort le jour même de son injection covid. Nous n'avions pas encore été entendus par la gendarmerie que la presse concluait à une allergie alimentaire ! La presse parlait du resultat de l'autopsie alors qu'elle n'avait pas encore eu lieu !]" https://t.co/YPa1MEDnQz
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 622 interactions against 470K followers, an engagement rate of 0.132%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 91K times each, and 0.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 103K interactions, about 165x its own typical post.
- What is Idriss J. Aberkane Ph.D x3's engagement rate on X?
- Idriss J. Aberkane Ph.D x3 (@idrissaberkane) has an engagement rate of 0.132%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 469,861 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.132%, Idriss J. Aberkane Ph.D x3 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @idrissaberkane have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @idrissaberkane post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.