Ibrahim Waheed engagement report
@ibreys - 9.5K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 9.5K followers, an engagement rate of 0.296%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.0K times each, and 2.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 274 interactions, about 9.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #faya2028, #bodubadhalu, #teamfaya.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #faya2028, #bodubadhalu, #teamfaya.
Compared with accounts its own size
Ibrahim Waheed's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 3 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.296%, Ibrahim Waheed sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,175 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.672%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.672% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 27% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 27% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 160 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 20, 20259.8x their median
It’s no surprise that the government is forcing MMA to monetize fiscal expansion. I have stated previously that, despite their claims, this government would have no choice but to print money due to gross mismanagement. It’s now evident that they are doing so after opaque transactions involving state-owned banks, the Sovereign Development Fund, and "investments" or contracts made by SOEs that have crippled their balance sheets. What’s most concerning is that this transaction is structured to avoid taking responsibility, with the government forcing MMA to initiate what appears to be, without doubt, Quantitative Easing, which is essentially printing money. And, to classify this as an "investment," this government has involved the Maldives Pension Administration Office to make this look like an "investment arrangement." This puts the integrity of the Maldives Retirement Pension Scheme at risk, and, when the Pension Fund is compelled to be involved in such an act, one could only imagine the extent to which this government is willing to fall. This government is not only printing money; it is endangering the retirement security of thousands of Maldivians and eroding trust in the system meant to ensure their social welfare. Instead of using such devious and destructive means, the government should acknowledge that Muizzu has reneged on his dubious pledge in the first place and submit any decision to print money to Parliament. By going the legal route and allowing the public to know exactly what is happening, the government should also provide transparency regarding how the action could debase the value of the Maldivian Rufiyaa, fuel inflation, and weaken citizens’ purchasing power.
- Aug 19, 20264.2x their median
ކަޅު ބާޒާރުގައި ޑޮލަރު ވިއްކާ އަގުގެ ހަބަރު ޖެހުން މަނާކުރަނީ https://t.co/g9Y2wSXqVi
- Aug 29, 20263.0x their median
ވަރަށް ދުވަހަށްފަހު @ilyas_labeeb މެންދުރު ކެއުމަށް ކެނެރީގެއަށް ގެނެވިއްޖެ https://t.co/Qxl6NzIfPs
- Jul 30, 20262.8x their median
Alhugandu menge ekuveri @amausoom dhevvi mendhuru ge keumeh, #Bananaleaf https://t.co/K4VFLslRO2
- Sep 8, 20262.1x their median
#Faya2028 މާލެ އޭރިއާގެ ކެންޕެއިން ޓީމްތަކާއި @faya_i އަދި ރައީސް @MohamedNasheed ބައްދަލުކުރެއްވުން. #BoduBadhalu https://t.co/5Vvj8m1AZW
- Aug 15, 20262.0x their median
މި ސަރުކާރުން އޮޅުވާލައިގެން 6.2 ބިލިއަން ރުފިޔާ ޗާޕު ކޮށްފި: އަމީރު https://t.co/UUPJdxy2pe
- Sep 14, 20261.5x their median
މިއަދުގެ މެންދުރު ކެއުން އަޅުގަނޑުމެނަށް ދެއްވި ބާބާސް ލެޖެންޑަރީ ރޯސްޓް ހައުސް އަށް ވަރަށް ބޮޑަށް ޝުކުރިއްޔާ https://t.co/dWQrA5UKYw
- Sep 8, 20261.5x their median
”މިހުރީ ފައްޔާޒް ހޮވަން“ - @MohamedNasheed https://t.co/bmsAi379WN
- Aug 10, 2026
https://t.co/9yxw3HrevO
- Sep 8, 2026
https://t.co/kSai2EQAOC ވަކި ކެނޑިޑޭޓަކަށް ތާއީދުކުރުމަކީ މައްސަލައެއް ނޫން، ޗެއާޕާސަންގެ މަޤާމަށް ވޯޓު ދިނީވެސް އަޅުގަނޑު ހުރީ ފައްޔާޒުގެ ފަހަތުގައިކަން ދެނެތިބެ: ރައީސް ނަޝީދު https://t.co/Gfqw87DkgW
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 9.5K followers, an engagement rate of 0.296%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.0K times each, and 2.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 274 interactions, about 9.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #faya2028, #bodubadhalu, #teamfaya.
- What is Ibrahim Waheed's engagement rate on X?
- Ibrahim Waheed (@ibreys) has an engagement rate of 0.296%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 9,454 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.296%, Ibrahim Waheed sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,175 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ibreys have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ibreys post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.