Back to @ib2_real's profile

Isaac G. Bryan engagement report

@ib2_real - 64K followers on X

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.063%
of 64K followers
Per impression
2.80%
1.4K views on a typical post
Reach
2.24%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
40
interactions (median)
Saved
0.14%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 64K followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 2.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 1857x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.063%, Isaac G. Bryan sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link40% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 40% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 202 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 29, 20261857x their median

    BREAKING: In a landmark 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court rules that "geofence warrants," which allow law enforcement to collect sweeping smartphone location data over a broad area, constitute an "unreasonable search" and violate the Fourth Amendment.

    65K8.3K4347753.3M viewsView on X
  • May 29, 2026539x their median

    Donald Trump has been fined $200 after he was months late to report buying and selling millions in stocks, per WaPo.

    18K1.4K88081916M viewsView on X
  • May 16, 2026311x their median

    Today thousands are marching in Selma calling for a full restoration of the voting rights act https://t.co/njFEzBmXuI

    8.7K2.3K1.3K139333K viewsView on X
  • May 22, 2026185x their median

    🚨 JUST NOW: California Gov. Gavin Newsom just went FULL DERANGED, "going to war" on the state's LARGEST gasoline provider Chevron due to high prices... ...yet he is PURPOSEFULLY inflating their prices with taxes and restrictions on energy 🤯 "Be sure to avoid Chevron." CLOWN. https://t.co/TRI3xrcis2

    5.6K1.4K36541617K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 2026176x their median

    BREAKING: Elon Musk is expected to have a net worth of $1.33 trillion this year

    5.8K3074665176.6M viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 2026127x their median

    Spencer Pratt voters think they live in the city of Los Angeles. Calabases, Malibu, Culver City, Marina Del Rey, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, and West Hollywood are chartered cities with their own mayors. To be fair, I doubt Spencer Pratt knows this either.

    4.5K38919928196K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 2026112x their median

    Black Men deserve to grow old. Black Men deserve to be kept safe. Black Men deserve to be free. Black Men deserve to be held. Black Men deserve to be protected. Black Men deserve more.

    3.3K1.0K5583166K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026104x their median

    Black residents in Gary, IN have been without power for 11 days. The federal government is failing to meet the immediate needs of the people. Trump hasn’t said a word. Grocery store shelves are empty, seniors are at risk, and basic needs are not being met. We are all Gary https://t.co/x3mZw4ZZYk

    2.5K1.6K666131K viewsView on X
  • May 16, 202668x their median

    Donald Trump is considering endorsing Spencer Pratt for LA mayor, sources claim, as underdog ex-reality star steamrolls opposition https://t.co/zIpzgWne9R

    2.0K2513211391.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 6, 202633x their median

    Spencer Pratt will never be Mayor of LA. Not because he’s a conspiracy propagating MAGA TV villain. But, because the people of LA actually care about our City. We are critical of those in power because the stakes are so high. The struggle isn’t a reality show.

    1.0K9911410549K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 64K followers, an engagement rate of 0.063%. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 2.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 1857x its own typical post. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Isaac G. Bryan's engagement rate on X?
Isaac G. Bryan (@ib2_real) has an engagement rate of 0.063%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 63,720 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.063%, Isaac G. Bryan sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ib2_real have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ib2_real post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going