Back to @iannuttall's profile

Ian Nuttall engagement report

@iannuttall - 82K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.129%
of 82K followers
Per impression
1.02%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
12.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
106
interactions (median)
Saved
0.24%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.3/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.129%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.1K interactions, about 86x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ian Nuttall's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.129%, Ian Nuttall sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,985 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,985 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,906 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video70% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 512 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 202686x their median

    GPT-6 Astra is really good at generating UI https://t.co/VTxpdKlDD9

    8.5K3281891161.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202644x their median

    “Dad you know how @drdre discovered @Eminem ? What if @eminem discovered me?” Meet Sadie my 10-year-old who produced this track for Eminem with no ai. https://t.co/0h8TOGcvPN

    4.1K24121135588K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202614x their median

    Imagine having the money to buy a 3 letter .com just to fuck with your competitors. Also kind of ironic given how hard they went at the guy who bought grok.⁠bot! https://t.co/chOO8V5iHD

    1.4K7316213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202613x their median

    https://t.co/SfprzrcIZM

    1.2K674011536K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202611x their median

    You can use your Claude plan in Amp now. Free and open to everyone. (By very very very very popular request.) https://t.co/ndFj5NbNbI https://t.co/nio57UzkW1

    9056313666228K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20267.9x their median

    It's always good to diversify your portfolio and have multiple streams of income. I built a handful of B2C micro SaaS projects a few months ago, enabled my SEO pipeline to write blog posts, and let them go. Slowly but surely, they've been growing and have now reached the $1k MRR milestone. Not life-changing money for sure, but it's good to have a few extra bucks in your bank account. I don't actively maintain them and just fix some bugs once in a while. I think they have the potential to grow further, but I just don't have the time as I'm focused on my best mobile apps atm. As usual, guys, slow and humble growth, no bangers to brag about. And remember that SEO works and it's the king!

    72199112100K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20267.3x their median

    Sometimes you just get lucky and find a market where it's incredibly easy to rank. This site is 6 months old. https://t.co/QufDLrslXk

    660101018165K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20266.7x their median

    SEO pro tip: 1. Get an export of your competitors best backlinks 2. Ask your agent to find a topical reason for them to link to you too 3. Manually approve suggestions 4. Let the agent send the cold outreach Grok Bot just got me two DR 84 links on a site with 3M visits/month.

    6202459459K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.4x their median

    Guys, I promise you, if you buy backlinks from Outrank you will get slapped out of the Google index and burn your domain forever. Too many people haven't lost their entire livelihood to a spam update yet and it shows!

    424258732109K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.9x their median

    Has anybody used my SEO skill/CLI for real work? https://t.co/QldToXEewN Trying to decide how useful it is, whether it needs to be more simple, go deeper, if it has bugs, etc. I still use it a lot but am leaning to simple single-purpose tools for most of my work now.

    3611638030K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 82K followers, an engagement rate of 0.129%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 1.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.1K interactions, about 86x its own typical post.

What is Ian Nuttall's engagement rate on X?
Ian Nuttall (@iannuttall) has an engagement rate of 0.129%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 81,885 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.129%, Ian Nuttall sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,985 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iannuttall have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iannuttall post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going