Back to @iamwesmoore's profile

Wes Moore engagement report

@iamwesmoore - 143K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.16%
of 143K followers
Per impression
2.99%
7.7K views on a typical post
Reach
5.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
230
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 230 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.16%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 2.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 6.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Wes Moore's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.16%, Wes Moore sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video76% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 249 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 20266.7x their median

    Trump’s decision to slash federal support for the Chesapeake Bay is yet another attack against Maryland — this time on our farmers, fishers, and millions of people who rely on the watershed to filter their drinking water. The Bay is our jewel moving Maryland’s economy forward, and we will protect it at all costs. Last year I signed the Chesapeake Bay Legacy Act into law to reduce pollution, clean our waterways, and protect farmland. Our work to protect our bay continues. https://t.co/Jd6UwduzbH

    1.1K335881215K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.5x their median

    Being the only Black governor in America and the first in my state’s history, isn’t something I wear as a badge of honor. It’s long past time we change that. https://t.co/Z15it3OAgN

    8811582051125K viewsView on X
  • May 4, 20264.0x their median

    Running it back for Maryland. More work ahead. 🤝🏾 https://t.co/4ujTkxQikb

    502673381684K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.1x their median

    NEW: Gov. Wes Moore reveals to @askDinaDoll that Democratic AND Republican governors have been working together for months to prepare for potential threats to the midterm elections. Moore says governors are “battle boarding” and “red teaming” different scenarios ahead of November.

    53216024652K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20263.1x their median

    I’m proud to say that in a 6-1 decision, our state’s Supreme Court ruled that it will be the people of Maryland who get to decide what our democracy looks like — not Donald Trump. Vote YES on Question 3 this November. https://t.co/rWOkRwD2mD

    48078155410K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20262.4x their median

    Maryland will not sit on our hands while getting punched in the face. On November 3rd, the people of Maryland will have a chance to vote YES on Question 3, and decide for ourselves what our democracy is going to look like. https://t.co/WzH3tcLCn9

    315571641727K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.2x their median

    60 days and a wake up. Doors to knock. Calls to make. Voters to talk to. Baltimore, we’re ready to work. https://t.co/UClODsJa7A

    369526779.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20261.8x their median

    We won’t tolerate any assaults on our voting power in Maryland, and Americans across the country are making it clear that they won’t either. https://t.co/UoBYdQFJl3

    21448147512K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20261.7x their median

    The road to blue runs through Maryland. Last night, Democrats came together to organize, mobilize, and build the momentum we need to win up and down the ballot in November. https://t.co/bY0jpfyZxm

    248329577.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.5x their median

    Any and all attempts to undermine Maryland’s free and fair elections will not be tolerated. https://t.co/KBnGiUEaXH

    250346637.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 230 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.16%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 2.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.5K interactions, about 6.7x its own typical post.

What is Wes Moore's engagement rate on X?
Wes Moore (@iamwesmoore) has an engagement rate of 0.16%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 143,339 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.16%, Wes Moore sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iamwesmoore have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iamwesmoore post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going