Tom Nash engagement report
@iamtomnash - 187K followers on X
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 403 interactions against 187K followers, an engagement rate of 0.216%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.88% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 16% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Tom Nash's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.216%, Tom Nash sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 58% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 190 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 7, 20265.4x their median
Remember who peddled fear and panic, and who told you the truth $PLTR https://t.co/LB4uau3C59
- Oct 1, 20263.7x their median
Some insights since this whole hijacked plane situation happened. Tough times make strong men. October 7 made Israelis rock hard. These guys punch back. Plane situation is a perfect example. Gaza situation is another. Israeli actions are 100% justified. (Some) American Jews playing along with the anti Israeli crap are cowards who are basically modern day kapos. I’d like to remind them how the Nazis treated the kapos when their usefulness ran out. If you disagree = feel free to kiss my ass 🫡
- Oct 10, 20263.4x their median
Remember a few years ago when people called me crazy for saying $PLTR is a $500 stock… https://t.co/sc0YkYWFKh
- Jul 29, 20263.3x their median
Everyone is arguing about AI stocks being overpriced. Wrong debate. The market is treating AI like it’s a zero sum game, where one company’s win has to come from someone else’s loss. That’s not how this works folks. For the first time in history, humanity is building an industry with virtually infinite demand. It’s hard for humans to grasp that concept since they have never seen it before. Every time AI gets cheaper, faster, and smarter, we don’t consume less. We invent ten new things to do with it. More agents. More workflows. More software. More compute. More infrastructure. This isn’t a bigger slice of the same pie. The pie is growing. The recent AI selloff is a massive opportunity if you have patience and long term mindset.
- Aug 6, 20263.1x their median
Everyone is excited about $PLTR now, after a major spike. Real investors get excited when it drops 30% and sit back and relax when it spikes. Please build good habits.
- Jul 30, 20262.6x their median
when this market flips, remember who told you to sit tight and relax, and who ran around like a headless chicken.
- Aug 4, 20262.6x their median
No better way to celebrate $PLTR earnings https://t.co/ogmztRtCQf
- Jun 20, 20262.6x their median
$PLTR is down 24% year to date. Not our first rodeo. Relax. https://t.co/j6S1e4QWzg
- Jul 30, 20262.5x their median
Markets have a funny way of making people question a thesis JUST before it starts working again. Every major investing cycle comes with a moment where fear becomes louder than facts. This AI pullback is pure narrative exhaustion and not business deterioration. The winners won’t be the people who predict the bottom. They’ll be the ones who stay invested long enough to see everyone else lose conviction.
- Jul 31, 20262.3x their median
People refuse to learn. When billionaires go on TV and scare investors… there is usually an angle being played.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 403 interactions against 187K followers, an engagement rate of 0.216%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.88% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 16% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.
- What is Tom Nash's engagement rate on X?
- Tom Nash (@iamtomnash) has an engagement rate of 0.216%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 187,062 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.216%, Tom Nash sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @iamtomnash have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @iamtomnash post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.