Back to @iamtomnash's profile

Tom Nash engagement report

@iamtomnash - 187K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.216%
of 187K followers
Per impression
1.88%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
11.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
403
interactions (median)
Saved
0.042%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 403 interactions against 187K followers, an engagement rate of 0.216%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.88% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 16% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tom Nash's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.216%, Tom Nash sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 190 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 20265.4x their median

    Remember who peddled fear and panic, and who told you the truth $PLTR https://t.co/LB4uau3C59

    2.0K7078481K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20263.7x their median

    Some insights since this whole hijacked plane situation happened. Tough times make strong men. October 7 made Israelis rock hard. These guys punch back. Plane situation is a perfect example. Gaza situation is another. Israeli actions are 100% justified. (Some) American Jews playing along with the anti Israeli crap are cowards who are basically modern day kapos. I’d like to remind them how the Nazis treated the kapos when their usefulness ran out. If you disagree = feel free to kiss my ass 🫡

    1.4K101291140K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20263.4x their median

    Remember a few years ago when people called me crazy for saying $PLTR is a $500 stock… https://t.co/sc0YkYWFKh

    1.3K4524737K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20263.3x their median

    Everyone is arguing about AI stocks being overpriced. Wrong debate. The market is treating AI like it’s a zero sum game, where one company’s win has to come from someone else’s loss. That’s not how this works folks. For the first time in history, humanity is building an industry with virtually infinite demand. It’s hard for humans to grasp that concept since they have never seen it before. Every time AI gets cheaper, faster, and smarter, we don’t consume less. We invent ten new things to do with it. More agents. More workflows. More software. More compute. More infrastructure. This isn’t a bigger slice of the same pie. The pie is growing. The recent AI selloff is a massive opportunity if you have patience and long term mindset.

    1.1K877021129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.1x their median

    Everyone is excited about $PLTR now, after a major spike. Real investors get excited when it drops 30% and sit back and relax when it spikes. Please build good habits.

    1.1K4248356K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20262.6x their median

    when this market flips, remember who told you to sit tight and relax, and who ran around like a headless chicken.

    9723251997K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20262.6x their median

    No better way to celebrate $PLTR earnings https://t.co/ogmztRtCQf

    9822053126K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 20262.6x their median

    $PLTR is down 24% year to date. Not our first rodeo. Relax. https://t.co/j6S1e4QWzg

    9283868585K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20262.5x their median

    Markets have a funny way of making people question a thesis JUST before it starts working again. Every major investing cycle comes with a moment where fear becomes louder than facts. This AI pullback is pure narrative exhaustion and not business deterioration. The winners won’t be the people who predict the bottom. They’ll be the ones who stay invested long enough to see everyone else lose conviction.

    89856365180K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20262.3x their median

    People refuse to learn. When billionaires go on TV and scare investors… there is usually an angle being played.

    8603134342K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 403 interactions against 187K followers, an engagement rate of 0.216%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 1.88% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 16% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.

What is Tom Nash's engagement rate on X?
Tom Nash (@iamtomnash) has an engagement rate of 0.216%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 187,062 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.216%, Tom Nash sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iamtomnash have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iamtomnash post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going