Back to @iam_preethi's profile

Preethi Kasireddy engagement report

@iam_preethi - 532K followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.01%
of 532K followers
Per impression
0.279%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
3.50%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
52
interactions (median)
Saved
0.097%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 532K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.279% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Preethi Kasireddy's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.01%, Preethi Kasireddy sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202658x their median

    They don't want you to know this but you can literally just add gelatin to ground beef and it makes it 100X healthier and tastier. This will give you tons of glycine and hydroxyproline, amino acids that have anti-inflammatory effects and balances out the pro-aging properties of other amino acids. Good ratio is one of these packets for every 4 oz. Mix it up good. It gives it a much richer texture that's amazing.

    2.7K2206618161K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.5x their median

    After thirteen years of watching mothers fight about infant feeding, I can say with confidence that it is largely a pointless, circular debate that simply upsets and undermines people. I’m saying this as a mother of three who breastfed, formula fed, combo fed, pumped/triple fed, dealt with oversupply, had one baby in NICU, had one easy baby, one fussy baby, one average baby, one tongue tie, one expert latcher, one with reflux, two who slept great, and one who didn’t. There is NO reliable, standard approach.

    22164229K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20264.2x their median

    How I knew I healed from disordered eating: When my thought process went from "how can I eat as little as possible to stay skinny" to "how can I eat as much as possible to maintain my figure and stay fertile." These two photos are almost 20 years apart. https://t.co/WnZL7WXocO

    203410122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.0x their median

    Things I believe most women should not do if they want to be super fertile: - Fasting daily - Cold plunging daily - Carnivore - Vegan - Low carb long term - Coffee before breakfast - Eating less than 1800 calories - Traveling extensively Your body needs to feel safe and well-fed to reproduce. Most of these trends do the exact opposite.

    133613219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.7x their median

    I grew up eating goat meat in India. It was everywhere and completely normal. In the US, it's almost impossible to find. I just discovered that Sprouts now carries ground goat! I'm honestly so excited. Look at goat vs ground beef (85% lean) per 100g: Goat: 109 calories, 20.6g protein, 2.3g fat, 2.8mg iron Beef: 215 calories, 18.6g protein, 15g fat, 2.1mg iron I love beef but if you don’t eat it, goat meat is a perfect alternative. It one of the most nutrient dense red meats you can eat. If you see it at your Sprouts, grab it.

    121316025K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.6x their median

    I know this is going to make a lot of women uncomfortable, but when it comes to fertility, it is better to be slightly overweight than slightly underweight. The research consistently shows that the optimal BMI range for fertility is 20-24. But when women fall outside that range, being underweight (below 18.5) causes more reproductive harm than being mildly overweight (25 to 28). Trust me, I love being skinny. But not at the cost of my fertility. The hardest part of my recovery was gaining weight on purpose. Being lean was my identity and I had built my entire sense of self around it. Letting go of that felt like losing a part of who I was. And I see this with so many women who are struggling with their fertility. They intellectually understand they need to eat more and gain weight, but emotionally they cannot let go of the version of themselves that is thin. Fertility requires fat. Your brain might not agree, but your biology does.

    12637020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.5x their median

    TLDR: 2 eggs a day is not enough during pregnancy Either eat 5+ eggs a day, or do 2-3 eggs + a choline supplement. https://t.co/czVVOFH90W

    11966120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.5x their median

    Breastfeeding did not come easy to me. It took me 3 babies to finally figure it out. My mom breastfed me for 2 months before switching to formula. My aunts were first-gen Americans who were told formula was just as good. There was no one in my family I could call and ask for help. In fact, my family thought it was unnecessary for me to breastfeed and that the baby needed formula. It took me 3 babies to learn what used to be passed down between women in a family. That knowledge is largely gone now. Most of us are starting from zero with no one to watch and no one to ask. I wish I could have watched more women breastfeeding as a child. My older two kids saw it everyday and I hope it shapes their understanding of what those early months with a newborn are like if breastfeeding.

    114411019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20262.3x their median

    I eat more than most men I know. I eat 3000+ calories a day and a huge chunk of that is carbs. Anywhere between 250-400g of carbs depending on activity levels. I eat carbs at every single meal. Fruit, fruit juices, honey/maple syrup, sprouted oats, soaked millets, dairy. I spent two years believing carbs are the enemy. For the first year I felt great. Brain fog was gone, no more afternoon slumps, and seemingly more energy. But then things slowly took a turn and I felt worse and worse. Women message me every week saying they had the exact same experience. I don't see the point in going low carb / no carb unless you have a medical reason to do so, like severe insulin resistance or an auto-immune condition. Your body needs glucose to function. If you don't eat it, your body will make it anyway through gluconeogenesis. So why force your body to manufacture something you could just eat?

    10249223K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.7x their median

    Freezing eggs at 38 to "buy time" often gives you far less time than you think you are buying. The math on 10 frozen eggs (roughly): - 8 eggs survive the thaw. - 5-6 eggs fertilize normally. - 1-2 embryos reach the blastocyst stage. - That batch leaves you with a 30-40% chance of one live birth. To have a 70% chance of a live birth at 38, you need around 20 mature frozen eggs. By age 40, you need 35 or more mature eggs. If you think egg-freezing is going to save your future plans to have a family, make sure you understand the live birth math first.

    7069120K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 532K followers, an engagement rate of 0.01%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.279% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 16% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

What is Preethi Kasireddy's engagement rate on X?
Preethi Kasireddy (@iam_preethi) has an engagement rate of 0.01%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 532,147 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.01%, Preethi Kasireddy sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iam_preethi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iam_preethi post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going