Back to @iamKalera's profile

KALERA | OUÇA FREE engagement report

@iamKalera - 166K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.468%
of 166K followers
Per impression
13.4%
5.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.48%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
778
interactions (median)
Saved
0.069%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 778 interactions against 166K followers, an engagement rate of 0.468%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 13.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 84x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #avigilia, #bgs2026, #g1.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #avigilia, #bgs2026, #g1.

Compared with accounts its own size

KALERA | OUÇA FREE's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.468%, KALERA | OUÇA FREE sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video76% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 107 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 9, 202684x their median

    QUEM FOI QUE FEZ ISSO AQUI EU QUERO SABER O RESPONSÁVEL KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK https://t.co/oPWBRTCZZ4

    50K14K613751460K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202622x their median

    Fabiana e Ieda passaram nove dias desaparecidas até serem encontradas mortas, enterradas em uma área de mata. O Brasil continua sendo um país onde mulheres são assassinadas todos os dias. E quando essas mulheres são lésbicas, o silêncio e a invisibilidade também fazem parte da violência. Fabiana e Ieda não podem ser apenas mais um caso. Este crime de lesbofobia precisa ser investigado com seriedade, porque combater crimes de ódio também é responsabilidade do Estado. Justiça não pode ser seletiva. Queremos respostas, responsabilização e o direito de existir sem medo!

    39K9.2K1994442.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202640x their median

    "Esquecimento é uma ferida que não se cura." prepare-se para o Samhain. 31 de outubro às 18:00 #AVigilia

    23K7.2K259779410K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20264.9x their median

    eu sendo a primeira pessoa brasileira a ter um amuleto próprio dentro do R6….. 🤡 https://t.co/kyPt5xPGFl

    11K263224181K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202612x their median

    boa votação, emores! 💙 https://t.co/Q22udSfN7b

    8.2K727382961K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202611x their median

    NAO TO CRENDO https://t.co/SzAoCoLvpM

    6.6K2.1K6411672K viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 202611x their median

    e se fosse obrigado todo debate ter verificação dos fatos? seria legal ne

    7.8K4501591578K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20269.3x their median

    gente, é simples. não tem como defender bet. quem defende ganha algo com isso.

    6.2K97011133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20267.9x their median

    WAIT… PALWORLD HAS A FARMING SIM COMING SOON?! I went down the PALFARM rabbit hole, and the more I looked into it, the more I felt like this is a test for something much bigger. (based on everything i’ve been reading, the community seems pretty split. a lot of people are calling it “animal crossing with pals,” while others think pocketpair is spreading itself too thin. from what i found, that’s not really what’s happening. palfarm is being built by a separate team, which fits the broader strategy of expanding the palworld ecosystem without pulling the core team away from the main game) Now, the more I thought about it, the more it reminded me of what Nintendo did with Mario. Mario didn’t become one of the biggest gaming franchises in the world because Nintendo kept making the same game over and over. They experimented by introducing games like Mario Kart, Mario Party, Mario Tennis, Mario Golf, Mario Strikers, Paper Mario, Mario RPG, Dr. Mario, and Luigi’s Mansion. None of those games replaced the mainline Mario titles. They introduced the same characters to completely different audiences and proved the IP could succeed in more than one genre. I’m not saying Palworld is the next Mario lol. What I’m saying is that the strategy feels very similar. Instead of asking, “How do we make Palworld 2?” it feels like Pocketpair is asking, “What other experiences can we build around this universe?” When you zoom out, the pieces start fitting together. You have the survival game, the TCG, Palworld Online, Palfarm, merchandise, licensed collaborations, publishing, and a growing ecosystem around the IP. (maybe i’m completely reading into this, but the more i research pocketpair, the clearer the strategy becomes. i genuinely think they have a real shot at becoming one of the most influential indie studios in the industry if they play their cards right)

    5.7K3038953526K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.2x their median

    bom segredos revelados pra vcs 👏🏼👀

    5.0K40411710648K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#avigilia#bgs2026#g1

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 778 interactions against 166K followers, an engagement rate of 0.468%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 13.4% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65K interactions, about 84x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #avigilia, #bgs2026, #g1.

What is KALERA | OUÇA FREE's engagement rate on X?
KALERA | OUÇA FREE (@iamKalera) has an engagement rate of 0.468%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 166,122 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.468%, KALERA | OUÇA FREE sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @iamKalera have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @iamKalera post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going